Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

OHC heads for Small Block Chevy?!?!?


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 BRAAP

BRAAP

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 4157 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 13 January 2010 - 03:45 PM

Overhead cam and multi valve heads used on traditional domestic V-8s! Seems like an interesting topic of discussion, yet not seen on this forum with any sort of depth or seriousness that aI was able to uncover.
I recently stumbled across a pic of the Moser SBC DOHC heads and like the younger generation of today, was immediately distracted and dropped everything else I supposed to be doing at the moment to dig little deeper, for no other reason than curiosity…
In searching this forum I would’ve bet money this topic had been covered to some degree in the past but couldn’t find anything with any real substance. (Possibly my search techniques genuinely suck, which I’m sure someone will exploit...) ;-)

I'll start out with the probably the most well known of aftermarket offered traditional V-8 OHC heads, the Moser/Harvey Crane Jr, DOHC heads!
DOHC cam, 4 valves per cylinder heads for the SBC short block. Dyno tested to as much as 11,000 RPM back in 1970! :shock:

Mr Richard Moser bio;
http://richardmoser.com/

Harvey Crane Jr, was instrumental in the development of these heads;
http://www.harveycrane.com/moser.htm

The HotRod magazine article, 4 pages worth;
http://www.cadvision...evyEngines.html

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#2 BRAAP

BRAAP

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 4157 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 13 January 2010 - 03:47 PM

Next up, I stumbled across this very interesting concoction using the vintage small journal SBC 265, (road draft crank case breather system). ;-)
Has all the appearance of DIY from a small shop/garage. Like it! :2thumbs:
Note the cool cam oiling.

Anyone, (TonyD,) have any info/history on this set up? Possibly some old school Bonneville or drag race effort?

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#3 Tony D

Tony D

    Wiki D

  • Donating Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9034 posts
  • LocationReno NV & Lucena Quezon, Philippines

Posted 13 January 2010 - 03:52 PM

I am getting wood over the vintage engine. Oooooh so badly it is desired...

The Moser is neat, but not in the same way the second one is!

My preference runs to Schubeck's DOHC Efforts. If you see it, you will see why.

http://www.schubeckr..._position=52:52

(Secret)

#4 BRAAP

BRAAP

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 4157 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 13 January 2010 - 03:59 PM

Tony has a bent towards Fuel Injected, Quad cam, huge by large displacement V-8's :burnout:

904 C.I.D. anybody?...
Posted Image

Twin plug D.I.S. Blown version..
Posted Image

Edited by BRAAP, 13 January 2010 - 04:10 PM.


#5 Tony D

Tony D

    Wiki D

  • Donating Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9034 posts
  • LocationReno NV & Lucena Quezon, Philippines

Posted 13 January 2010 - 04:10 PM

Look under the valve cover on the link I gave.

Look closely...

Muahahahahaha!

#6 BRAAP

BRAAP

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 4157 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 13 January 2010 - 04:13 PM

Look under the valve cover on the link I gave.

Look closely...

Muahahahahaha!


Rocker actuated valves vs direct actuation?
Pseudo hydraulic-mechanical lash adjustment system, hydraulic lifters adjusted with a .002" clearance for NO lifter preload, effectively eliminating any lifter pump up at elevated RPM's?

Edited by BRAAP, 13 January 2010 - 04:38 PM.


#7 letitsnow

letitsnow

    Discarded Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 870 posts
  • LocationRochester, NY

Posted 13 January 2010 - 04:59 PM

http://www.aardemaso...les/Page313.htm
Posted Image


I've also heard that vh or vk heads are rather similar dimensionally to a SBC head. Here is a thread about it. http://turbo-infinit...337e6cb2c951435

'89 Firebird.......'77 280z.....'90 Firebird.....'88 300zx

#8 PanzerAce

PanzerAce

    Used Member

  • Donating Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 735 posts
  • LocationMerced, CA

Posted 13 January 2010 - 05:25 PM

Posted Image


Yup, happy time in my pants after seeing that.
1973 240Z, 3.0L Rebello, "running them funny sideways triple deuces". Living and breathing again after almost a year in the shop. DEATH BY SUV, 5-16-2012 RIP.
1978 280Z Possible recipient of anything salvageable from the '73

#9 Michael

Michael

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 627 posts
  • LocationSW Ohio

Posted 13 January 2010 - 05:40 PM

Are these "just" DOHC, or do they use some form of variable-valve timing? One suspects that the better modern aftermarket conventional-style OHV heads outflow most of the 4-valve DOHC exotics. And the engine rpm is probably more limited by bottom-end stability than by the valvetrain. Maybe 4-valves offer mid-lift flow advantages because the valve curtain area is larger for the same valve lift? Do 4-valve heads have a combustion chamber advantages over canted-valve 2-valve chambers?

On a related note, what about multi-valve cam-in-block schemes? The advantage is short timing chain, compact design, no need to disturb the timing chain when removing the heads... but lower valve mass and possible combustion chamber advantages.

#10 jbk240z

jbk240z

    Custom user-title!

  • Donating Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 697 posts
  • LocationDenver, Co

Posted 14 January 2010 - 03:58 AM

I remember hearing about these OHC kits for the SBC a few years back. Very interesting, check out this link...http://www.aardemaso...les/Page313.htm

#11 grumpyvette

grumpyvette

    Moderator

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3561 posts
  • Locationloxahatchee florida

Posted 14 January 2010 - 05:34 AM

a really well designed and properly manufactured 4 valve single or double overhead cam head could easily boost the hp potential of the chevy v8 engines a great deal.

http://www.billzilla.org/2v4v.htm

http://www.gofastnew...er-concept.html

http://www.araoengin...evy/chevybb.htm

bbc
Posted Image
Posted Image

2: 1.84 In. valves BB Chevy Intake Ports
BB 32v. 2: 1.840 IN. valves Pontiac Pro Stock 2.38 In. valve
0.1 94.4 0.1 70.8
0.2 206.5 0.2 147.5
0.3 312.7 0.3 230.1
0.4 375.24 0.4 277.3
0.5 448.4 0.5 342.2
0.6 472 0.6 395.3
0.7 494.42 0.7 436.6
0.8 494.42 0.8 448.4
2: 1.6 Ex. valves BB Chevy Exhaust Ports
BB 32v. 2: !.6 EX. valves Pontiac Pro Stock ! o Stock 1.9 Ex. valve
0.1 88.5 0.1 59
0.2 182.9 0.2 118
0.3 259.6 0.3 182.9
0.4 318.6 0.4 241.9
0.5 381.14 0.5 300.9
0.6 424.8 0.6 330.4
0.7 430.7 0.7 342.2
0.8 430.7 0.8 344.56

SBC
Posted Image

Posted Image

http://en.wikipedia....erhead_camshaft

http://www.merkurenc...inder_head.html

http://xlforum.net/v...d.php?p=2263412

http://books.google....page&q=&f=false
" IF YOU CAN'T SMOKE THE TIRES FROM A 60 MPH ROLLING START YOUR ENGINE NEEDS MORE WORK!"

#12 Daeron

Daeron

    DON'T PANIC

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2129 posts
  • LocationWPB, Florida USA

Posted 17 January 2010 - 02:35 AM

Look under the valve cover on the link I gave.

Look closely...

Muahahahahaha!


Rocker actuated valves vs direct actuation?
Pseudo hydraulic-mechanical lash adjustment system, hydraulic lifters adjusted with a .002" clearance for NO lifter preload, effectively eliminating any lifter pump up at elevated RPM's?


The most mind-bogglingly supercool mega-awesome awesome awesome thing *I* saw about that engine was the cam drive/timing system as compared to the accessory drive system.

I cannot ruin it for you; you have to go back and look yourself.
Fusible Links blow.

1-5-3-6-2-4, counter-clockwise from 9 o'clock when viewing from driver side fender

There's something about a white Nissan......
Wisdom is knowing how much you do not know.
"Indeed, if fish had fish-lore, and Wise-fish, it is probable that the business of anglers would be little hindered." -JRR Tolkien

ALL YOUR BOOST ARE BELONG TO US

#13 Drax240z

Drax240z

    Stuper Modifier

  • Super Moderators
  • 3621 posts
  • LocationVictoria, BC

Posted 17 January 2010 - 09:14 AM

Something along the same lines:

Posted Image

Posted Image
2005 BMW M3
2000 BMW 528iT
1985 Chevrolet C20

#14 PanzerAce

PanzerAce

    Used Member

  • Donating Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 735 posts
  • LocationMerced, CA

Posted 17 January 2010 - 10:04 PM

Something along the same lines:

Posted Image

Posted Image

And they've only been promised for how long now? :rolleyesg
1973 240Z, 3.0L Rebello, "running them funny sideways triple deuces". Living and breathing again after almost a year in the shop. DEATH BY SUV, 5-16-2012 RIP.
1978 280Z Possible recipient of anything salvageable from the '73

#15 rsicard

rsicard

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 867 posts
  • LocationTucson Arizona

Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:16 PM

What is the technical advantage of double overhead cam engines? The newest corvette engine gets very good power with a Gen IV pushrod engine.

#16 BRAAP

BRAAP

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 4157 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:40 PM

What is the technical advantage of double overhead cam engines? The newest corvette engine gets very good power with a Gen IV pushrod engine.


In the most basic sense, SOHC vs the in block design of a 2 valve head, advantages of OHC is more direct valve actuation with the possibilty of lighter weight valve train, at least as seen by the cam lobe. ;-)

Disadvantages are, for a V- engine, is the added overall wieght of an additional camshaft or 3 depending if it is SOHC or DOHC design, overal CG of the engine is higher with the cams being up on top of the engine, and common designs are taller and most of the time wider making the overall powerplant package physically larger, (modern Ford OHC V-8's are a good example of this).

Outside of that within the 2 valve constraints, OHC advantges are not very large and also carry just as many not large disadvantages as well. As you pointed out, GM is still succesfully employing the single in block push rod 2 valve design in some of the worlds most powerful and best performing cars in the world, Vette Z-06 and ZR-1. :2thumbs:

Where OHC really starts to shine is when utilizing multi valve technology vs the 2 valve. Valve area per CID is much greater allowing for greater breathing, (combustion chamber roof is more vale than head material allowing the cylinder to breathe easier with less aggressive cam timng vs a comparable 2 valve design). Now with seperate intake and exhaust cams, fine tuning of the intake valve timing independant of the exhaust valve timing can be accomplished, and add to that real time variable cam phasing of the seperate cams, a very broad power band can be had while maintaining decent economy and mileage. :2thumbs:

Edited by BRAAP, 18 January 2010 - 07:45 PM.


#17 MAG58

MAG58

    Bawb Dawg

  • Donating Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 648 posts
  • LocationBloomington, IN

Posted 18 January 2010 - 08:20 PM

I'd like to have a set of those Arao heads! I think that there is much room left in developing multivalve, pushrod engines. They flow quite a bit more on the top end, and the force of having to move the pushrod and rocker, etc back on a valve closing event would be shared over two separate sets of valve springs meaning that the valve spring tension wouldn't have to be so astronomical and they could rev higher!

Datsuns n' stuff. 


#18 Grim

Grim

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 617 posts
  • LocationMountain Home AR, 72653

Posted 18 January 2010 - 08:39 PM

Something along the same lines:

Posted Image

Posted Image


What's this? Is it valve-less? Looks very interesting.
"We're all a bunch of mugs! We work twenty-four hours a day, don't eat; we don't sleep and we spend all of our money just so we can go out again next Sunday and break the damned car." - Horst Kwech, circa 1970

#19 BRAAP

BRAAP

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 4157 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 18 January 2010 - 08:43 PM

What's this? Is it valve-less? Looks very interesting.


Rotary valves! :2thumbs:

http://www.coatesengine.com/

Edited by BRAAP, 18 January 2010 - 08:46 PM.


#20 mutantZ

mutantZ

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 139 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted 18 January 2010 - 08:51 PM

Is there an inherent draw back to the rotary valve design? I've heard of these for years but never really seen a mainstream application. I'm afraid I'll be swapping an 11 turn triple into my electric car before these come out.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users