Jump to content
HybridZ

BC Coilovers with T3 bolt in camber plates


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Justin i think we have talked on another thread. 

My strut towers were hacked up to begin with and about two years ago i decided to go to a T3 bolt in camber plates. I did a ground control type coilover setup, but i didn't like that the springs would be completely unloaded when the car was jacked up and I wasn't happy with the available suspension travel at the ride height i wanted to be at. So i decided to go with the BC coilover setup. 

I tried to adapt to the T3 camber plates, and Gabriel from T3 was super helpful, even designed a setup that would work with the BC setup at a low cost to me. 

 

But i wasn't very fond of the way T3 top hats interact with the camber plate. So i welded on my three bolt plates as i shown in the other thread.

post-12001-0-71179700-1476457093_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

My strut towers were hacked up to begin with and about two years ago i decided to go to a T3 bolt in camber plates. I did a ground control type coilover setup, but i didn't like that the springs would be completely unloaded when the car was jacked up and I wasn't happy with the available suspension travel at the ride height i wanted to be at. So i decided to go with the BC coilover setup

that is basically the exact predicament im in. How do you like the BC setup so far?

 

Also, I see you're in south Lyon, I live in waterford, work at chrysler. any chance I could come by and see it in person? I'm thinking of swapping out much of the suspension and brakes this winter but it'd be awesome to see the fitment before spending the cash. I'm also pretty handy with a wrench but an excellent buyer of adult beverages. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi 

The quality of BC parts is top notch. T3 provided a solution at a very reasonable price but after analyzing it i wasn't happy with the way the T3 top hats interact with the camber plates. My car is still deep in the project phase so i can't report on the ride, but from what i've heard, it's pretty good. 

I have both T3 setup and a BC setup in my garage so you can take a look at the parts before buying anything. 

I am an engineer for AVL powertrain, I have some colleagues that work on site at chrysler. You can come by and check stuff out, talk Z cars, wrench, drink alcoholic beverages in whichever order. PM me for my number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious, what didn't you like about the T3 top hat/camber plate combo? I have the weld-in version of that setup for the front waiting to go on, and I'm probably going to go with the bolt on version for the rear (my strut tops were hacked up by a shop already).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern is mainly with the front setup.

To aid in turning, T3 uses a needle roller thrust washer that is sandwiched between the top hat and camber plate. The conventional camber plate design uses a ball joint carrier to handle suspension shock loads as well as turning. While I think the T3 setup is innovative I think it has a flaw. The camber plate is fixed to the chassis, but the top hat changes angle as the strut goes up and down. The only compliance in the system is the thrust bearing, but it is not intended to be loaded in such a way which leads me to believe that it will fail prematurely. 

 

See the cross section below. I made a ( representational) model of the strut assembly to made sure i am not missing anything. In the section, The yellow is the camber plate, the red is the top hat, and the gray rectangular bit is the thrust washer.

 

post-12001-0-94574400-1477309325_thumb.jpgpost-12001-0-16695800-1477309334_thumb.jpg

 

Having voiced my concern, i know there is a number of people using this setup so my worries may be unwarranted.

The BC coilover setup uses a ball joint as used in a conventional camber plate. Unlike the T3, the ball joint carrier on the BC setup is steel, so it should not wear out as fast as an aluminum one would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern is mainly with the front setup.

To aid in turning, T3 uses a needle roller thrust washer that is sandwiched between the top hat and camber plate. The conventional camber plate design uses a ball joint carrier to handle suspension shock loads as well as turning. While I think the T3 setup is innovative I think it has a flaw. The camber plate is fixed to the chassis, but the top hat changes angle as the strut goes up and down. The only compliance in the system is the thrust bearing, but it is not intended to be loaded in such a way which leads me to believe that it will fail prematurely. 

 

See the cross section below. I made a ( representational) model of the strut assembly to made sure i am not missing anything. In the section, The yellow is the camber plate, the red is the top hat, and the gray rectangular bit is the thrust washer.

 

attachicon.gifstrutassy_exp.jpgattachicon.gifstrut_section.jpg

 

Having voiced my concern, i know there is a number of people using this setup so my worries may be unwarranted.

The BC coilover setup uses a ball joint as used in a conventional camber plate. Unlike the T3, the ball joint carrier on the BC setup is steel, so it should not wear out as fast as an aluminum one would.

Interesting, staring at the parts off the car I thought that was a weird interface/I was missing a part, but I figured it was okay. Hopefully it's okay, I won't know until after winter anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...