Jump to content
HybridZ

240Z Turbo

Members
  • Posts

    1081
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by 240Z Turbo

  1. On 2/17/2023 at 11:39 PM, Dat73z said:

    Thanks @240zturbo, and this is why I love HybridZ and continue posting here even in a time when everything has basically moved to FB, IG, etc.. Lots of concrete info on here from people who have actually done this whereas it's hard to separate the opinions from real data on social media. 

     

    I don't post much build stuff on FacePlant and tend to stick to the forums because it is easier for people to find the information.  It's good that you are documenting your build and hopefully it will inspire others. 

  2. 13 hours ago, Dat73z said:

    @240Z Turbo how much boost were you running on that setup? 

     

    Thanks for the tables that's a helpful reference point and yeah I'd like to have some form of knock detection. 

     

    To be clear the 30/32 value is all in without boost retard and I pull ~1 deg/lb of boost so it's closer to 20deg all in at 7k @10psi. I'm also running 91 pump and looking at meth injection since fuel availability and costs are issues for me. 

    From memory I could run about 18-19psi on 93pump and on race gas (110L) I would simply add the 125shot on top of that or I would not run the nitrous and up the boost to ~28psi (from memory).  Felt about the same powerwise either way on race gas, but the nitrous made the boost hit instantaneous.  Because I was running a Powerglide trans I pretty much had to hit the nitrous off the line to get it going, but with lower boost (maybe 12psi).  After the shift I would hit the boost controller button and go to high boost.

     

    I located what appear to by my pump gas tune from right before the car was sold and I had TimZ open the files yesterday with his software.  However, the timing values seem abnormally high so I don't want to reference them.  I asked TimZ if he could provide some general timing advice to this thread since he probably has the highest HP L6 in the USA.  I've just been out of the L stuff for so long I simply don't remember. 

  3. This was from 2001, but should give you a feel for what the motor would take on 93 pump and I think I was making peak torque at ~4200rpm.  Didn't know as much back then so probably could have jacked in more timing at Redline, but I'll see if I can find my last tune file.  Important though is that I used the knock sensor religiously to tune.

     

     

    adv.jpg

  4. On 2/13/2023 at 11:52 PM, Dat73z said:

    Hey @240Z Turbo it is apparent you have a lot of experience with this so thanks for posting the info. I was actually afraid to add timing towards redline as I wanted to get the car on the dyno first to baseline and go from there so I limited my timing at 7k to 30/32 degrees.

     

    I just downloaded the old Wintec2 software so I need to locate my old tune files to see what type of timing I used to run on my 3.1L twinturbo w/125 shot nitrous.  However, I'm thinking it was around 18-20deg peak torque.  30-32 deg seems like a lot of timing for 93 pump even at redline so be careful.  The two tools you need are a wideband, which I believe you have, and a good knock setup that allows you to discern between real knock and engine noise.  I can't stress enough the importance of a good knock sensor setup because your motor will live and die by engine knock on a turbo motor.

     

    You've probably seen my old setup from 20 years ago, but it ran 10.6@134 and to my knowledge that motor is still alive and running to this day.

     

    engineds.jpg

    timeslip1.jpg

  5. On 2/11/2023 at 12:30 AM, Dat73z said:

    @240Z Turbo apologies I missed your Q on timing. The 123 ignition has a MAP sensor. I pull roughly 1 degree of timing per psi of boost and target 20 all in at 1 bar. I can also control vacuum advance off throttle through the MAP.

     

    On a turbo car you want to add timing as you approach redline as opposed to pull timing as you approach redline.  I looked at the 123 Ignition and it appears you have two 2D tables, RPM vs TIMING & MAP vs TIMING, which is less ideal vs a single 3D map where TIMING is a function of both RPM and MAP.

     

    When you hit the throttle the MAP goes to atmospheric pressure, where you can typically set a static advance number as the car starts to build boost, which on the GTR is about 14deg.  The lower that advance (retarding timing) the more exhaust energy will be created and the faster the turbo spool.  The downside is that if you live in a hilly area then you are more often under slight load and the high EGT's will put your header through the test.  As the motor builds boost you will then start to retard timing and at peak torque is where you will have the highest cylinder pressures so the lowest amount of timing is used.  After you pass peak torque the cylinder pressures are reduced and you can then start to add back timing.  As a rule of thumb you can typically add at least 5deg of timing from peak torque (where it starts to drop) until redline on 93 pump.

     

    Here is what the ignition timing curve looks like on the GTR for 93 pump 749hp@wheels.  Disregard the actual numbers because that is a function of the engine and just look at how timing is managed.  7deg at peak torque ramped to 18deg at redline.  You'll notice that it sits around 8deg until 5400RPM because the torque curve remains flat.

     

    No description available.

    No description available.

     

     

    Below is the same thing, but for the EVO IX on 93pump 663hp@wheels.  Again, don't focus on the actual numbers, but how the timing is handled.  Timing is 2deg at peak torque ramped up to 11deg at redline.

     

    No description available.

    No description available.

     

     

     

     

  6. On 2/10/2023 at 8:51 PM, Dat73z said:

    @240Z Turbo Basically I an using an oil pressure sensor to trigger a relay to provide 12v direct from the battery to the fuel pump green wire in the harness. The 12v relay harness I made is perfectly fine, but downstream from the connector the 50 year old OE wiring is all melted.

     

    I'd recommend 10G from relay to pump if pulling more than 20amps and/or run is over 10ft, but 12G would be fine if you know you're not pulling more than 20amps and/or the run is less than 10ft.  On the GTR I ran ~10ft of 4g from battery to the fuse block (through a 50amp breaker) and then 12G Tefzel from fuse block to two 330lph fuel pumps.  I get my Tefzel wire from here, but for the low gauge wire I like sourcing from the local welding supply.

    https://www.corsa-technic.com/

     

  7. I've never experienced the issues you stated and other than my GTR, I simply tighten by feel and don't use torque specs on the downpipe or turbo inlet.  BTW, the M8x1.25 can torque to 26ft-lbs per the table  assuming the highest grade of "9T."  I have 160K+ miles on the EVO and more than 100K of those miles was an aftermarket turbo and never had hardware failure just using out of the bin bolts from Lowes.

     

    I've also used the inconel shields on various projects (TT ZR1 & EVO) over the years and again, didn't have hardware issues.  I hope you problem is solved!

     

     

    newicpipefinished1_small.jpg

    heatshield1.jpg

    newicpipefinished-2.jpg

    install14.JPG

    shield11.JPG

  8. My sincerest apologies as it looks like I gave you inaccurate information.  I pulled one of my old downpipe studs from a box to measure the turbine side threads and they were M10x1.5 so I struggled to understand how I thought the studs were M8.  Turns out the tap I used to measure the nut side threads was an M8x1.25 tap, but I didn't see that is was one of my heli-coil taps.  To make it worse, I was reading the Nm column instead of ft-lbs for the torque spec, but luckily that was the correct spec in ft-lbs for M8 assuming you have the highest grade stud.

     

    The correct information is as follows for M10 GTR down pipe studs

    Turbine side is M10x1.5 torqued to 19ft-lbs

    Nut side is M10x1.25 torqued to 36ft-lbs

     

    Attached is Nissan's torque table for various size bolts depending on Grade.

     

     

    GeneralTorqueSpecs.jpg

  9. That gasket looks good so you should be fine assuming the down pipe flange is flat.  You can always run it on a belt sander and you will quickly discover if the surface has high spots.  Now that you have the inconel hardware just get some good prevailing torque nuts and tighten to 25.5 ft-lbs and you're golden.  If your threads on the nut side are M8x1.25 then the prevailing torque nuts from Nissan for the GTR downpipes are an option.

     

    If you're going to do a manifold from scratch then I would highly recommend that you go twinscroll as opposed to open scroll and vband.  Also, I never have issues with the 4 bolt flange leaking on any of the iterations of turbo's I've run on the EVO.  TwinScroll will give you significantly better spool and allow you to run a larger turbine, which reduces drive pressure.  The lower driver pressure makes the car way less knock prone on 93 pump allowing you to run more timing or more boost or both.  You'll want to keep the runners small using 1.25" schedule 10 pipe, which is good for applications up to about ~1100hp.  The smaller runners will keep the port velocity higher and allow for quicker response and will not affect hp vs a 1.5" schedule 10 pipe.

     

    I'm a big fan of the S362 SXE (6268) and based on my testing in comparison to the Gen1 GTX3582r (6262), I lost no spool and picked up 50hp@wheels (~600whp vs ~550whp) on 93 pump.

     

     

  10. FYI, VR38 downpipe studs are M8x1.25 on nut side and torque spec is 25.5ft-lbs so don't over think it.  If you're having issues sealing then it is likely due to the mating surfaces not being completely flat and that gasket, which appears to be just a flat piece of metal with no raised sealing area.  VR38 gaskets are thicker with a raised edge around the sealing surface to create the seal.  If you have future issues you might consider the remflex carbon gasket (18-005) as they conform the surface due to their ability to be compressed. 

  11. Why not just use prevailing torque nuts?  That is what my GTR uses from the factory and they don't loosen.  The pic below was from my GTX3071r turbo swap, but you can see the factory stover nuts and they don't budge.

     

     

    WaterTube7.JPG

  12. Twins should spool well if properly matched with the right turbo.  Keep the runners small using Schedule 10 1.25" Pipe (1.44" ID) for anything below 1000hp and this will keep exhaust velocity up to improve response.  I wouldn't go bigger than G25-550 and you'll need to play around with the A/R.  Knowing what I know now I would probably opt for a single turbo in a twinscroll configuration with something like a S362 SXE.  You'll have to find someone to build the manifold and it needs to be paired correctly with two independent wastegates.

     

    My two twinturbo setups....

    engine.jpg

    engineds.jpg

  13. I've been making progress slowly but, surely.  Got the inner rocker installed on the driver's side.

     

    IMG_6552.JPG.7629d0e9b3df2a7b3a46ead3dfef44ad.JPG

    IMG_6553.JPG.58be637707adc922caf931320b60ca36.JPG

     

     

    Next order of business was to fit the floor pan.  I left ~1" of overlap on the trans tunnel and then ground to bare metal, treated with a rust neutralizer, and painted with a weld through primer.

     

    IMG_6591.JPG.4b0ba4bdb972824b9b420babf289e315.JPGIMG_6592.JPG.a6be52119385c256876bc21a097bd363.JPG

     

     

    I did have a portion of rust that had to be removed at a seam on the trans tunnel towards the firewall.  Removed an ~3" section and replaced with fresh metal.

     

    IMG_6594.JPG.c3cb9b3a97bc3d1c1872de7d20fc6e91.JPG

    IMG_6596.JPG.02c8e1b97ce41e24061eb0cd408f85a3.JPG

  14. Front rocker has been grafted in and I decided to keep as much of the original good metal as possible.

     

    IMG_6503.JPG.cf764a1d4fa0c55d2ed6f5bacced15a0.JPG

     

     

    I now need to prep the metal with the POR rust neutralizer and then coat with POR15 prior to putting on the inner rocker.

     

    IMG_6506.JPG.008f7d09bef0762952467e7044ffc6b9.JPG

     

     

    This is the inner rocker mocked up for alignment, but prior to welding in place I cleco both the inner and outer rockers in place and hang the door again along with front fender to confirm gaps and alignment.

     

    IMG_6505.JPG.d84818f37ecd84e19192a9df3eab6027.JPG

  15. If you want to upset your wife then work on your Z as much as I've been doing.  I mounted the door today to see how much sag there was from removing the rocker and to my surprise the door gap looked good.  I guess leaving the pan in place is key to keep things alinged.

     

    Started with patching in the lower dog leg.  Not too concerned with grinding to perfection since it won't be seen.

     

    IMG_6489.JPG.537b6a5ebda1171d72374ee3f8347092.JPG

    IMG_6490.JPG.e74b0a7583cdaa124239e85c88e53daa.JPG

    IMG_6493.JPG.04bae54615906a43321e3ae5005cc4a6.JPG

     

     

    In the front I had to cut out some rust and also replace a piece on the side flange of the firewall where it connects to the inner rocker.  Next step will be to patch in the new forward rocker.

     

    IMG_6497.JPG.57beee1645d407526067ddf932a9ddf6.JPG

    IMG_6498.JPG.27fe80bfab860f713eefdcb59fe37d3a.JPG

    IMG_6499.JPG.7dd429868ae4b0e441d0bdf5dfb5d2b1.JPG

     

     

  16. I was able to remove both rockers, but this time I left the floor pan in place.  I'll have to see how the door gas look, but I don't think the car moved any like it did when the pans were removed.  There was a substantial amount of runs on the inner rocker, which made its way to the inner fender, but only at the very bottom.  However, I had to completely remove about 4" of the flange for attaching the outer rocker.

     

    IMG_6480.JPG.d3037d5b62dfe26a2ed34a459534cd5c.JPG

    IMG_6482.JPG.36fd6ab08452e0d107caed37aef2cda3.JPG

     

     

    The next step was to build it back up starting with the small patch on the inner fender and then replacing that 4" mounting strip.  I getting pretty good at this patch panel work I might add.

     

    IMG_6484.JPG.117a28c60ba4c3b716c9b549abc3daeb.JPG

    IMG_6486.JPG.dc1d680ea488c1d31fdfaf98fcb57f34.JPG

     

     

    I wish KF Vintage made all of the parts need, but unfortunately I was force to buy some parts from Tabco.  Seeing the quality and fit of the KF stuff, the tabco parts are junk.  I had to make three relief cuts in the outer fender to get it to fit properly, which where then welded back up after I got the contour I wanted.  I'm now ready to tie in the lower dog leg and patch the front rocker and I'm then ready to install the inner rocker.

     

    IMG_6487.JPG.9d3bc2997fa25dc72cc82a840fa9473a.JPG

  17. 8 hours ago, Dat73z said:

    That is a lot of work! but I'm sure the end result will be worth it. 

     

    What amps and wire diameter did you use when tig silicon bronze brazing the seams? I did the same last summer to fill some rust pinholes in my windshield section and I found it really difficult to find the correct balance balance between melting the filler and base material. I think maybe my filler was too thick at 1/16" and I should've been using 0.045" or smaller. 

     

    That was 0.065" filler rod so I don't think you need to go smaller, but you can.  Amps are probably set to around 30-40 (not sure how many amps actually used) depending on the thickness of the metal and the surrounding mass, but as you know you're not melting the base metal when brazing.  What I found best was to just practice on some flat metal to get the hang of it because when you TIG you naturally want to melt the base metal.

     

    TigBraze1.JPG.0bdbab6f5ae8e29d69b77c8c233a2421.JPG

     

     

    With only a few practice passes I TIG brazed a custom oil pan for my EVO.  The EVO pan is two super thin layers of metal pressed together and have a zinc coating between them.  If you simply TIG weld it blows out when it hits the zinc so you have to TIG braze the joints where it connects to the stock oil pan.

     

    PanFinish1.JPG.35f7635893d2d1882a377778af06d4f7.JPG

    PanFinish3.JPG.6a3ccf601c619bb5a9c7e514a2683556.JPG

    PanFinish2.JPG

  18. 15 hours ago, Ironhead said:

    Looks like great work on a very "needy" shell.

     

    I was just trying to imagine, think how different our "hobby" would be if cars didn't rust.  By different, I mean better.

    Needy is an understatement as I just ordered another $1800 in parts from KF Vintage.  My fabrication skills are adequate for this car, but I picked one of the more challenging 240's as a first time restoration.

  19. Man this work is tedious and it doesn't feel like your making any progress after putting so many hours into it.  Below is the fender nut that was recovered and the welded back to the backside of the hinge cover.  I also had to repair the big gaping gash in the panel, which turned out well.

     

    IMG_6450.JPG.9a857e6123f7ed1a9cd21de117adbbcf.JPG

    IMG_6451.JPG.86bcb1d9026257a9f22ef379034a536c.JPG

    IMG_6453.JPG.38936f7ee2c9cd66e4466bbcfe95475f.JPG

     

     

    So much fun to weld in these washers where I removed the spot weld!  It looked like the car had been hit on the bottom edge of the rocker as you can see some creases at the bottom, which I welded and flattened.

     

    IMG_6452.JPG.94339e764452258da8d03d0c02a54b6b.JPG

    IMG_6454.JPG.af0d15963b0470ef0d89befed7322eb6.JPG

  20. For some reason the upper mounting point for the fender just below the window pillar had been torn out leaving a big gaping hole.  It looks as if the metal was punctured from the outside with a hammer and the nut that is welded on the backside was gone.  When I removed the rocker panel the nut fell out so I saved it and cleaned it up with a wire wheel and chased the threads with a tap.  I repaired the metal surrounding the hole with a hammer and dolly and will TIG weld the ripped metal and TIG weld back the nut.  Below is a pic of everything prepped for welding.

     

    IMG_6448.JPG.0e9a66f124f80b1ab0f8f659222adbd0.JPG

×
×
  • Create New...