Jump to content
HybridZ

Sparky12

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sparky12

  1. Theoretically it sounds like a good plan but I'd take it from everyone else here. The L engine has is unique spots. Generally speaking the logic behind high revving is short stroke and big bore. Short stroke allows more revolutions because of well... obviously the small travel distance. Large bore to compensate for the short stroke would be my best guess. Big bore is more horsepower while big stroke is more torque, thus the reason why you see strokers. People love torque but torque doesn't like top end. If you really wanted to go ape **** on your project then get liners/wet liners, bore that thing out as much as you can without running into problems, and run the l24 bottom end. Don't take it from me though, I just base my thoughts off of F1 info and such... Thats the only reason why they have 3 liter V8's and V12's. Make 700hp but only 370ftlb, tiny tiny tiny stroke with a huge bore. I don't have the numbers in front of me but I think it was something like 25mm stroke with 97mm bore. Something crazy.

    This was, more or less, exactly why I thought of this to begin with. But I think maybe I should embrace the inline-6 L-series engine's torquey nature instead of trying to fight it.

  2. Sounds fun, except I wasn't really thinking of a stroker at all. My idea would be more like an L24 that's been bored waay over. I like the short stroke idea because it would be able to rev quicker (i.e. from idle-redline sooner than an L28 or an L31 would) because the piston speed at redline would be lower. Only downside I see to this is that I'm basically taking out the torque from an inline 6 (which is naturally torquey)...am I thinking in the wrong direction?

  3. I think you have your wires crossed a bit. You're going from "I want a race engine that revs to 9000 rpm" to "I want to drive it on the street and I'd like it to run on pump gas."

     

    To me those seem mutually exclusive for an L series engine. Have you thought of what would be acceptable to you in terms of durability? Most L's that rev that high have a lifespan measured in hours.

     

     

    I think I know exactly what you mean. I guess what I'm looking for is the most rev-happy engine that would still run on pump gas and would hold together for more than a few hours. Obviously, a 13:1 12,000rpm 300whp 2.5 liter wouldn't be able to satisfy the other requirements. What do you think would be the limits of compression ratio, engine speed, and cam duration where it would still be durable and not require a trip to the local airport for fuel?

  4. With a street cam I'd say you're headed in the wrong direction. As Brad-Man says you'll have less power because of less displacement, and you'll have more theoretical rpm capability that you won't use because the cam is too small. If you were trying to wring it out to 9000 rpm I'd say this is probably a good way to go because the rod/stroke ratio will help out, but that doesn't sound like your plan.

    That's actually more or less exactly what I was aiming for. I was thinking about a 300deg (intake and exahust) cam with 560 lift which, if I read right, is about as big a cam as anybody would want to try and drive on a stret car. Would this cam be about what I need? Also, would you shoot for a higher compression ratio? I'd like to stick to 93 octane if I can.

  5. Alright, so how would this setup sound, experienced Z gurus?

     

    L28 block, bored 0.40 over

    L24 rods

    L24 crank

    L28 flattop pistons 0.40 oversized

     

    on a shaved P90 head with 1mm headgasket, with a hot street/mild race cam and 44mm mikuni's? The Lengine calculator gives me a displacement of 2629cc's, with a stock (0.080mm) deck height, with an 87mm bore and 73.7mm stroke (stroke/bore ratio of 0.85). I put an N47 head on it (close to the same compression ratio a shaved P90 would give?) and it gives me a 9.72:1 cr. I'm looking for a rev-happy, high-rpm street engine...would this be a step in the right direction?

  6. Is the car a 5-speed too? 2-door 810's are super-rare, so consider yourself lucky! For more power out of the engine, you'd probably be best off swapping to a larger engine. The 2.8 liter from the fuel-injected 280Z and ZX would fit very neatly, and the 2.8 liter turbo (L28ET) from the 280ZX would be a killer setup! Oh, and I think we all want to see pictures of the car :)

  7. Ah, cool! To the original poster (or anyone else who wants to answer), you used a j30 subframe with mostly s14 parts on the rest of the rear end, with q45 hubs and axles...how much wider was the s14 subframe than the j30? Would an s13 subframe (which I've read to understand is the same design) be any narrower? Anyone have experience using the Skyline or Z32 subframes? I'm not getting a Velo Rosso kit for my Z, just good ol ZG flares, so I don't know if I could get away with a wheelbase that's as wide as yours. ;)

×
×
  • Create New...