Jump to content
HybridZ

Midri

Members
  • Posts

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Midri

  1. Has anyone used one? I'm wanting to switch out all my smaller gauges (clock does not work) I've already got Depo water temp and oil pressure gauges, looking to use the 3rd spot for some kind of fuel gauge if possible... anyone done anything neat looking for their fuel gauge if they removed the stock one?

  2. You're really thinking about putting six 60mm throttle bodies on a L6 engine? Are you serious or is this a troll post?

    Serious, I've got them just sitting here... Why not try it? Engines not going to be left stock, obviously. Have headers on it now, looking getting one of my P79 heads worked on to increase airflow.

  3. So I picked up a bunch (6) of 240sx throttle bodies for basically nothing and was playing with them when I realized I could chain them all together and use them as individual throttle bodies for an L28. Would need custom runners made with injection ports, but that's fairly easy to fab up... I could also maybe do 1 intake per 2 cylinders and use the 3x mikuni carb intake... That's all stuff we're going to play with...

     

    My question to you smart people is how is the air metered in an EFI ITB? I've looked at a bunch of pictures and install guides and have not seen any indication of intake O2 sensors and obviously you can't use a MAF.

  4. You're probably going to convert several decent-to-good engines in to many boxes of parts, none of which give you anything more than that completely assembled engine you consider.

     

    This really is not worth the effort, there is no 'magic bullet'.... Look at the  raise in potential performance of the CR change... something like 0.2% per compression point or something like that.... The  N42 flows MARGINALLY WORSE than the P90, offsetting any perceived gains. You are trying  to out think engineers that has millions in their budget to get the most power under the curve.

     

    Unless you want to spend money, you aren't getting anything earth-shattering. In fact, you likely just end up with a list of parts to keep straight later on because everything is mismatched. I took an engine out of a 1980 280ZX 2+2...225,000 miles on it. Put it in my stock 76 2+2 with stock EFI on it, and then ran around 145 to the rear wheels on the dyno with the stock manifolds and a crush-bent partially collapsed, QUIET exhaust system (quieter than stock, in fact!)

     

    I've run consistent 15.50's @ around 90mph all day long at the drag strip, and get 22-27mpg towing a small trailer. I've taken it across the country 2X over 32,000 miles (16,000 miles each trip, when I say 'around' I mean 'AROUND' the USA!) It starts like a stock car,  runs quiet like a stock car, and gets me sworn at by guys that have all sorts of go-fast  goodies  still basically stock and a lot of effort put into it...but not much else.

     

    Sell the parts to people with a like mind who think they can change the world with a conglomeration of magic bullets, and take  that money to put it into proper tune up of the stock engine you get. You have not mentioned once your induction  choice...which, on a stock intake really limits what you  will do N/A, period. 

     

    You have an 83ZX Flat-Top long block....meaning a  head that flows maybe  190cfm at 450-500"?, and an intake that maybe flows 190cfm. 

     

    You cam it to optimise power, and the stock EFI won't like it.

     

    The power is not where you think it is. The parts are all the same. It's how you tune  them  to work as  a proper package  that makes power. 

    Thanks for the info, I was going to use the N42 intake manifold (pre egr) and find a 60mm throttle body to put on it, if I go with the P79 head I'll use my 6-1 or 6-2-1 headers (they're both round). As for the actual induction I was thinking running the stock airbox without the top half (the flat flute) with the filter held in place by a custom mounting bracket. I'd think the larger rectangular body into the hole design would put more pressure into the intake than a "ram air/cold air" tube would when moving, but I'm going to play with that I guess.

     

    We've taken L28s apart before, for valve and cylinder wall repairs; I'm not to worried about parts getting miss matched. Also I have so many gasket kits... really want to use them... lol

     

    I'm wanting to put a Megasquirt 2 in the NA at some point, have a wide band O2 sensor and some other misc parts sitting around that could be put to good use.

     

    Mainly I just wanted to get as much out of an NA engine as I could and since I had all these misc parts I know people have done some crazy combos and gotten interesting results. Needed to know if it was worth doing a high CR on an L28 (read a few forum posts on it, and agree retarding the timing to get high cr engines to not knock kinda defeats the overall goal.)

  5. 8.8:1 vs 10:1 on different head, with different flow characteristics. I've been through what your searching, and tearing down, or "rebuilding" a motor is not worth it for the minimal performance increase you will see.

     

     

    As for the turbo cam in the N/A application.  The wider lobe separation will certainly not help with your detonation issues.  Having no experience using two identical cam profiles other then lobe separation I can't really say what it will do.  But all the articles tell me you will be losing power.  Whether it's worth it over the stock cam?  Who knows.  I probably wouldn't spend $100 on lash pads to find out.

     

     

    If your willing to do some DIY headwork, and N42 on flattop pistons could be a great option for you.  But if you are just doing some mix and matching with parts, it's not worth your time or money.   The '83 N/A motor should be a good runner.  If it is, let it be and build a turbo motor.

    The engines are all being torn apart, regardless of if we plan to mix and match them. 4 of them have been sitting for 5+ years and the one that was running is a franken engine already and we're wondering how well it was put together so we're taking it apart (it was originally going in a different Z than the one it came out of, I got a rust free one a while back and my current one is about 99% rust, so it was going to be pulled anyway.)

  6. I'm confused, I don't see an option from your choices above for flat top motor, but you keep mentioning it. Yes a P79/54 flat top would be best for na , but your 54 has dish pistons as you stated.

    I mentioned that I was open to the idea of getting flattop pistons, but later in the replies I also pointed out that I have located a L28 out of an '83 ZX that should have a F54 with flattop pistons as well.

  7. My suggestion in that case is to keep the 83 Unmolested and just run it and forget about making work for no real benefit.

     

    How would an increase from 8.8:1 to 10:1 not be worth it? I'm legit wondering, since you are one of the pros on here Tony. I have no problem getting a different cam if I need to or having one of my stock ones machined.

  8. Sorry,  I didn't really answer your whole question. I was just mix and matching the pieces that you had.  You don't really have too many options.

     

    Flattops and the N42 are great.  Unless you have some good ignition control, or a cam with some more overlap then the stock one your most likely going to get some detonation (Without bringing the timing back).   

     

    The N42 with dished pistons is going to give you a stock 280z engine.  The dished pistons and the P79 is going to give you a stock low compression L28et with funny shaped exhaust ports.   What you do from here is up to you since you'll have to be purchasing parts anyhow.

    Well the turbo cam is 270intake/260 exhaust, could it be used in the NA engine with N42 + flattops? I've tried to research how all the different measurements of a cam shaft play into dynamic compression ratio, but it's just not something I'm comfortable with yet.

     

    Also I just got informed I can grab an '83 280ZX's L28 for cheap, which should be a flattop F54 block.

  9. So these are apart in pieces and not assembles engines? 

     

    Or were they assembled engines that you took apart.

     

    Nothing you do will have any appreciable effect on anything material.

    Complete engines that have been disassembled due to sitting for years, we're replacing gaskets, checking seals, etc. Just want to make the best engines out of all the parts (one of the engines is not going back together)

  10. P79 and a dished piston block for the turbo, stock cam or non hydraulic turbo cam

     

    N42 and a dished piston for the N/a. Stock cam

     

     

    No brainer if you've done any sort of research at all.

    Well I was looking for a bit more theory craft...

     

    Why would you suggest dished pistons instead of getting flat tops for the NA? I was aiming for higher compression, but I'd probably need a new cam right?

     

    Also if I could get an F54 block with flat pistons would it make more sense to use than the N42 with flat pistons, being I'd have to buy pistons for the N42?

  11. Sooo I've got 3 L28 engines now all out of cars and wanting to mix and match them to make the best 2 I can. I'm building one turbo engine and one na engine.

     

    Blocks:

    2x N42 (dished pistons)

    1x F54 (brand new dished pistons, recently rebuilt)

    Heads:
    1x N42

    1x N47

    1x P79

    Cams:
    2x stock

    1x Schneider 270-60F-14

    1x Schneider 270-60F-14H (I think this one is for a hydraulic head.)

    Turbos:
    1x Stock L28ET Turbo

    Any suggestions for pairing? Also I'm aware I probably should get some flat top pistons for the NA since all of these engines have dished ones.

  12. So I'm playing musical cams this week and pulled my stock cam out which had 0.16" lash caps with 0.04" sinks (so they're effectively 0.12") is that stock? I can't see anyone selling anything close to that thin. My other engine has 0.16" lash caps but they're not sunk. What is the stock lash cap thickness? Do they have a sink?

  13. So I recently acquired 2 after market cams from a buddy of mine. One is a Schneider 270-60F-14 C1/D1 and the other is a 270-60F-14 C2/D2 (not sure what the difference is. If anyone knows I'd love to know.) I also received a set of 0.16" lash caps to go with them. What else do I need to be aware of when installing this more performance driven cam? Also these are sold as turbo cams, does it even make since to put them in a NA car?

    (My old cam is stock, Japan "A" model)

  14.  

    The black 78 roller you got looks like an excellent platform to start building from. How does the interior look?

     

    Seats look good, carpet looks good, dash is shot (never seen one that was not unless it was refabed), center heater plate is good, console is good until ash tray where it's split. Just going to cut it after ashtray and custom fab an arm rest.

     

    You did not actually figure out the problem.  Those two things are unrelated.

     

    Good luck with the new/old cars though.  Good to have a hoard of spare parts.

     

    You say that, but I've got everything else on the engine tuned up and I had the exact same issue with a N/A Toyota Celica engine when I was a teen that I had totally forgotten about. When I put straight pipes on the Celica is sucked the bottom end right out of the engine. Technically you're right though, it's not back pressure -- that's just what all my mechanic buddies use as the general term for the stupid dynamics you have to account for with air flow and pulsing of the engine. Here's the best write-up I've seen on it: http://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/exhaust-the-straight-scoop-on-backpressure.168578/ -- and once again, you are technically correct that back pressure is not what I need, but the exhaust pipe has EVERYTHING to do with it.

  15. So I got up early to go to our local Nissan dealership's car show yesterday, I'm not a morning person... almost did not go. Wanted to show off my Raty '78 280z. Hung out there for a few hours, got to chat it up with some other 280z owners.

     

    One guy helped me figure out why my '78 feels so anemic off the line (previous owner put way to big of exhaust pipes on it so no back pressure at all), and I started chatting with another fella (who had a really nice 280z almost restored completely to factory stock) about rust issues and how I was going to have to stop working on my Z and learn how to weld and figure out how to put some new frame rails in (passenger side no longer connects under the floor board to the car or to it self) and he just said to me, "I've got a complete '78 that's stripped down to the bones from Arizona (so little to no rust), you want it?". I thought to my self, "Yes, of course I WANT IT... but I can't afford it." and replied sheepishly, "How much you want for it?". His reply, "Come get it and it's yours." -- Over the moon, this complete stranger just offered to GIVE me a RUST FREE '78 280z (sans engine, transmission)!!!

     

    So I go over to his house with a uhaul car trailer and get ready to tow it and he points out he has another 280z, a '77 that also needs an engine and tranny. This one has a bit of surface rust on the top, but has full interior, 2 perfect looking seats, and the under body is almost as good as the '78 he's giving me. He says, "If you want that one too, take it."

     

    Needless to say, I spent all day yesterday hauling 280z back to my house. My birthday party was also last night (I turned 30 on Sept 30th) and I was not even mentally there, I was basically "shell shocked" for the rest of the day. Unable to process any emotional stimuli.

     

    post-40725-0-67326700-1443981494_thumb.jpg

    post-40725-0-90087500-1443981498_thumb.jpg

    post-40725-0-02247900-1443981501_thumb.jpg

  16. I've taken the pan off my engine twice, both times whilst still in the car. You've got about as much chance as winning the lottery as seating that gasket properly without taking the engine out of the car (or at least lifting it with a hoist) so you're going to get leaks and no, you probably should not reuse your gasket -- especially if you put the pan on with the engine still in the car, you probably ripped/stressed it some places.

  17. A transistor (I personally would use a MOSFET) will work for outputs I suppose if you use PWM drive them with 12v and gate them with 5v/3.3v, but your inputs to actually read the sensors from the engine are all going to be 12v so be careful.

  18. I guess what I was imagining when I asked this was, to use you arc welder analogy: Imagine you have an imperfect circuit where the contact point are not great and there is a bit of an arc. If you put an LED blinker relay "upstream" of this point the arcing is intermittent, it flashes between the points like a spark plug. If you put the same relay "downstream" of the blinker assembly the arcing IS constant, like you might see in an arc welder (if you just kept it in one place, which you wouldn't, but whatever...)

     

    The general consensus is that this was all a lot of hoopla about a very minor part of the electrical system. Everything else that I have done (refresh blinker assembly, install flasher units, install LEDs) reduces the load so drastically that I can expect regular and consistent performance from here on out.

     

    The ark would never be constant, regardless of placement. The relay would control the flow of electrons and either source voltage to the contact or drain voltage from the contact.

  19. I recently ran into an issue on my z31 where rust got into the fuel lines, and I couldn't prove why. I looked inside the tank and it was clean. I postulated the alcohol content stripped some rust buildup from the tank and sent it through the pump. Made more sense because the pump won't hold pressure when it's shut off anymore either, so perhaps the particulates damaged the check valve while it worked its way into my fuel lines. Not too sure, but it made me wonder if it'd be worth it to make a conversion for some people/cars.

     

    On my S30 I'll run flex fuel if I can map it right, I don't inherently hate ethanol.

    Djwarner, thanks for the article, kept me awake during music appreciation.

     

    Just wanted to comment on this for science!

     

    Ethanol is actually a lot less effective a solvent than gasoline is. Gasoline, however leaves varnish which then makes things look dirty and thus it's not used as a solvent (though a byproduct, Diesel; can be used as a very effective solvent -- we actually use it a lot to clean engine parts and the more manly of the mechanics club wash their hands with it). So it stripping rust from your tank would make no sense. The reason ethanol is bad for older vehicles is it dries out older rubber/plastic compounds causing them to become brittle and crack.

×
×
  • Create New...