Jump to content
HybridZ

kce

Members
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kce

  1. Hey all.

     

    Back in 2009 I bought a decently clean '71 240z that I knew needed some engine and wiring work. Then life got the best of me (as it often does) and I moved and the car stayed in storage and sat for 10 years. My dad is currently working on getting it drive-able with the priorities being the brakes, the carbs and the wiring. Unfortunately the wiring was pretty messed up when I got it and sitting hasn't done it any favors. Lots of broken insulators, bare wires, cut/spliced stuff and just general brittleness due to age.

     

    I'm curious if anyone has a shop recommendation in the Portland, OR area that specializes in zcars that could give us a quote of what it would take it get this car running again, I'm all ears.

     

    If anyone's interested in a silver '71 240z in the Portland, OR area too... we can talk!

     

    Thanks all

    K

     

     

  2. Datsun Parts LLC is notorious for falsely advertising parts, shotty workmanship and blanket denials when confronted with evidence of defects. If you buy a motor from him you have to be smoking crack...I personally know of 3 people who purchased motors from him and none were satisifed. One was a leaker...the other two didn't run...besides...you can barely build a Stroker for what he sells them for. Avoid him @ all costs.

     

    Wow. Good to know.

  3. I've been trolling around for a LS1 or a LS6 preferably accompanied with a T56 transmission. There are deals to be found via Craiglist or the LS1tech forums but unfortunately I live in Alaska. This makes examining the engines in person pretty difficult and I don't really want to risk spending $5k on something site unseen. I also don't want to spend $800 on a plane ticket just to come back empty handed.

     

    I can arrange for a barging company to ship palletized stuff up here for what is "affordable" by local standards but I would need to go through a salvage yard that has more flexible shipping arrangements other than FedEx or UPS. (This pretty much kills eBay as an option for me).

     

    Can anyone recommend a reputable salvage yard in the Seattle area that has experience shipping stuff via barge lines? Because I can't look things over myself I would feel a bit better about spending all that money if there is at least some guarantee I'm actually getting what I paid for. (A warranty of some kind would be lovely.)

     

    I'm also not at all adverse to the idea of taking the ferry down to Bellingham and trolling around there. Does anyone in the Bellingham/Blaine area care to recommend a quality salvage yard?

     

    Suggestions welcome.

  4. The real thing that gets me is just up at the boarding gate. It is downright impossible to get people to follow directions, and every single time it just turns into one big cat herding session. If our flight is running 20 mins late, and we're in the middle of boarding, we don't mind a passenger coming up and asking when to board. Usually a simple answer of 'wait till your number is called, just a couple minutes' is all it takes. Don't mistake that answer for poor customer service. Do you really expect us to drop everything we're doing and hold up the other 149 passengers trying to board because you couldn't listen to directions? I answered your question, let me get back to what I need to do. Passenger blew up at me today for that and for whatever reason that self entitled attitude just got under my skin this time.

     

    This is one thing that gets me too. I don't understand why it is so hard... board from the back of the plane first. It is the most efficient way to board the aircraft, and therefore the fastest. Or just have first-come-first-served seats. It's pretty hilarious when your seat is in the back of the aircraft and you're in the first section to board, yet 1/3 of the passengers are already on the plane, in the aisle blocking your way with their ridiculously over-sized carry-ons. Instructions are not that hard to follow people.

  5. i sure am going to give it a try, and for the guy who neglected to buy bumper repair and got two part epoxy instead, ever think thats why yours cracks :icon56:

     

    This seems like a pretty decent method to repair the cracks in the dash if done right. Maybe the key is to use a material that can expand and contract with the dash?

     

    It would be interesting to see a long term durability comparison between using the foam and bumper compound method and the fiberglass method. I've tried using fiberglass (cloth and compound) to repair a broken console but as soon the plastic on the console flexed the fiberglass just pealed off. The plastic on the console was sanded to try provide more surface area for adhesion, but it was still a no-go.

     

    Has anyone considered using fiberglass filer? It's basically like Bondo except with fiberglass fibers mixed in with it. The big benefit over fiberglass cloth and resin is that it is sand-able.

  6. even if they are cast =P.

     

    This! As far as I can tell. They are basically just "Designer Wheels" and that the extra money you are paying is not for any technical merits but simply because they are Watanabes. I figured for around $500 a pop, they would be handmade of super-secret ultra-light, ultra-strong alloy by a master swordsman somewhere in the Mountains of Japan. :D

     

    I'm just guessing, but I imagine the real reason they cost so much more than other wheels is: 1) they're made in Japan (kind of like the JDM parts obsession for the import crowd?), 2) the importation cost, 3) they *are* quality pieces of work, 4) the brand name and 5) limited supply, high demand.

     

     

    I like HRE wheels...but at 1200-1500 PER WHEEL i simply cant afford em either. Welcome to the club.

     

    I hear you. In my opinion, the Watanabes are perfect wheels for the S30. They just look like they belong to the car. BUT, there's plenty of other good looking wheels that cost half of that for a set. And there's no way I could square with spending an extra $1000 for "Designer Wheels" that are not better from a technical or performance standpoint. You could do a lot of other things to your car for $1000.

  7. Unfortunately, I neither have the space, time, nor inclination to deal with going through a whole donor car. I agree that if you use as much of your donor car as possible it's a really affordable (as much as it a SBC swap can be) way to go about doing an LS1/T56 swap. But maybe my circumstances will change, and if they do I'll certainly consider that option.

     

    I think I'll just keep an eye on the LS1tech forums, once I'm finally ready to take the plunge.

  8. Could you possibly post the V8 calibration process for the tach when you get the manual. I and many others would appreciate it. Thanks!

     

    I imagine that the SBC swap into an S30 is such a niche market that I'm willing to bet that the owner of JTR barely breaks even on the manuals. And I'm sure a lot of time, effort and money went into producing that information. If we don't pay something for it, that information wouldn't be available (or certainly not as widely available).

     

    Also, in the grand scheme of things the cost of the manual is so small compared to the doing the rest of swap... and the return in terms of not screwing up, buying the wrong parts, wasted time, etc. is probably worth a hundred times more than the price...

     

    Just my thoughts... plus I'm too lazy to re-type those pages here. :D

  9. So LSx S30 guys, what do you think?

     

    I am still at least a year or two away from getting anywhere close to doing an LS1 swap but I also would be interested in purchasing some quality headers. None of the current options really appeal to me, and I don't have trouble spending the money as long as they are *quality* pieces.

     

    I'm not sure if you need a commitment to buy right now, or if something as vague as "I'll need a set sometime" works... but if you need a tie breaker... I suppose I can put the cart before the horse and purchase a set... details pending of course.

  10. Some of you guys have gotten killer deals on your stuff... :twisted: I'm amazed that any one has gotten an LSx and T56 for anything less than $4k. That's awesome.

     

    For those of you that ended up getting your engine and transmission of eBay, instead of from a local salvage yard... do you have any recommendations (other than the standard for eBay) to make sure you're getting a decent donor drive line?

     

    Thanks for replying. The context is very helpful.

  11. I'm trying to gauge how much money I could expect to spend on a decent (under 100K mileage) LS1 and a T56 from a salvage yard. If eBay prices are a good indicator it looks like *just* the engine and transmission can be had for around $4,000 - $6,000 depending the make of the engine (i.e., a LS2 compared to an LS1). On the other side of the coin, it looks like you can buy a brand new complete LS1 crate engine from Summit for about $5800. A brand new T56 transmission from Summit seems to run around $2800.

     

    I would interested to hear how much those of you with a Gen III/IV swap payed for your engine (and/or transmission) if it came out of a salvage yard. What's a reasonable price one can expect to spend? What mileage? Did you use a whole donor car or did you just get the engine and transmission? I'm sure everyone will have pretty variable numbers here, so the location where you bought the salvaged engine (and/or transmission) would also be useful to me as well (I'll probably pull my stuff from somewhere in the Portland, OR area, if I ever get back down there.).

     

    Thanks.

  12. The key word being "look". Many have been able to run decent compression ratios with the N-heads, and it's easier to get higher c.r.'s with the N-heads (less shaving, no need to shim cam towers).

     

    I didn't mean to say that I think the N-heads are bad in any way, nor that I actually have a good reason to support my earlier statement. I can't argue with your results. Maybe the whole more-quench vs. less-quench argument is really just a red herring. Like you said, it's easier to get higher compression ratios with the N-heads and with a proper well designed, cammed and managed engine build you won't see any more detonation problems than you would with a P79/P90. I suppose comparing the two cylinder heads is really just a specious comparison anyway because of the amount of variability in each build (as mentioned earlier).

     

    Like they say, "Numbers talk and bullshit walks!"... and I can't argue with your numbers. :D

  13. It's actually closer to 8.5:1 I believe. The stock L28ET is in the mid 7's! BRAAP seems to be a lot more conservative on this debate than others, and has plenty of experience and knowledge to back him when he says that these engines are very detonation prone. Thus he doesn't readily recommend higher compression setups (that I've seen). There's actually a very wide spread of what people have seen from different setups, showing that there's just too many factors involved to make a conclusive statement that "X" setup will work perfectly for anyone.

     

    Hmmm. I stand corrected then. I thought the static compression ratio was higher with the P90/P79 flat top combination. After doing a little impromptu research it does look like the P79/P90 have larger combustion chambers (53.5 CCs) compared to the smaller (~44 CCs) size of the N42/N47.

     

     

     

    Now, if we want to say that X setup in X conditions in X circumstances then we can make an educated guess as a community and be in something on an agreement.

     

    THIS! If I have learned anything from this thread (other than that I don't know anything) it is this. It is extremely hard to get an "accurate" side-by-side comparison of different cylinder heads because a lot of these setups are "one-off".

  14. The hardest part of comparing the P79 to a P90 with flattops is that most who swap the heads will swap the head complete with cam.

     

    I've just recently replaced a P90 with flattop long block assembly with a 1983 P79 long block assembly over a days time and notice no difference in performance between the two at stock boost.

     

    You don't have detonation issues running the P90 with flat top pistons and a turbo? I thought that combination would be get you pretty close to 9.1:1 static compression ratio (of course, your dynamic compression ratio is really the "compression ratio" that matters for determining your detonation threshold)? That seems pretty high to run with any boost but maybe I'm mistaken.

     

    EDIT: Also, excellent point about the cam swap.

  15. Where's the P-79 vs P-90 discussion?

     

    BRAAP pretty much wrapped it up on the first page:

     

    If using flat top pistons, the P79 is my first choice with the P90 being essentially equal. The only time I would prefer the P90 over the P79 is for very wild street an all out race applications that require crazy porting in the exhaust to match a cam and induction for an engine that only works wells above 4000-5000 RPM, idle at 1200+, etc, (.550â€+ lift) other wise for N/A street applications the nod goes to the P79.

     

    So as for the P90 vs. P79 discussion, it seems the determining factor in cylinder head performance is really the porting and any other modifications that are done. This of course, makes any sort of side-by-side meaningful comparison extremely difficult.

     

    As far as I can tell, the choice between what I call the more-quench combination (P79 or P90 with flat top pistons) and the less-quench combination (the N47 or N42 with dished pistons) really depends on your application and what kind of engine you want to build (I guess?). I have no educated reason to believe this, but the combustion chamber on the P79 and P90 look far superior to those of the N47/N42. The smaller combustion chamber and increased quench caused by the flat top piston, seems indicative to a more effective combustion chamber design. Good flame front propagation, swirl and mix and all those crazy fluid dynamics engineering-y things are important to making a performance engine. It's not just enough to have volumetric efficiency (moving fuel/air into the engine and moving exhaust out), thermal efficiency is also important (extracting the most mechanical energy possible from the stored chemical energy stored in the fuel).

     

    On Quench:

    The goal of performance engine builders should be to build their products with as much detonation resistance as possible. An important first step is to set the assembled quench distance to .035". The quench distance is the compressed thickness of the head gasket plus the deck height, (the distance your piston is down in the bore). If your piston height, (not dome height), is above the block deck, subtract the overage from the gasket thickness to get a true assembled quench distance. The quench area is the flat part of the piston that would contact a similar flat area on the cylinder head if you had .000" assembled quench height. In a running engine, the .035" quench decreases to a close collision between the piston and cylinder head. The shock wave from the close collision drives air at high velocity through the combustion chamber. This movement tends to cool hot spots, average the chamber temperature, reduce detonation and increase power.
    Source
  16. I am at about the same stage where you are but with an LS2. I am modifying a 240z tank to mimic a 280 tank to limit chassis fabrication and fuel guage trouble. I am having a re-sealable service access port put in it to be able to open it and clean it out if it gets dirty (again) or if I need to add and change fuel cell foam.

     

    Do you have a thread about your tank modifications? I don't want to thread-jack but I would be interested in hearing more about how you adapted the 240 tank for fuel injection.

     

    And why not just use a 280z tank instead? Is it that much more difficult to swap one in place?

  17. Good to know.

     

    I have already read the How to Rebuild GM LS-Series Engines book. Next up (along with the JTR manual) is Vizard's How to Build Max Performance Chevy Small-Blocks on a Budget and How to Build Horsepower. I already read the first edition of the "Performance Small Blocks on a Budget" so it will be interesting to see how the second edition holds up.

     

    Although I got blasted last time I linked an article from Hot Rod, they did a pretty cool comparison of about ten different LS* cylinder heads (Here). Hopefully it will come in handy if/when I start looking at cylinder heads.

×
×
  • Create New...