Jump to content
HybridZ

T-56 reverse lockout


Guest chevsun

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. My Z is down as the 80,000 mile bottom end would not stand the RPM heads and cam mixed with speed shifts so the 377 is being built and will be installed this winter. My question has to do with the T-56 reverse lockout. I love this trans over the T-5 I ran last year but it takes two hands to crash through the lockout to get it into reverse. Is there any way to make this easier? Is there a spring that can be changed or removed? By the way my t-5 held up to all the abuse I gave it but after reading all the negative about it I upgraded to the T-56 and a twin disc clutch (read big bucks). So after the new motor I expect my failures to be rear related. I am already breaking stub shaft u-joints but I am starting to suspect that a weak rear suspension is allowing the rear to squat so far as to create some excessive shaft angles any thoughts on this theory? I have read in my other post on u-joints that some seem to think the stock components should handle the power. I am only running 195-75-14 radials. Will the BFG drag radials fit the wheelwells on a 73 240?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My site has pics of the spring that needs to be changed out. Needless to say it looks just like a damned valve spring - it's pretty beefy! It's mounted in a housing bolted to the top of th etrans on the driver's side near th eshifter. Unbolt that, unscrew the brass looking pasrt, remove a snapring, and there's the spring.

 

However be careful you don't put in too WEAK a spring like I did icon_rolleyes.gif A weak spring in there is at least as bad as too strong a one since hitting reverse becomes so easy.

 

Once you unbolt that piece off the trans it becomes pretty obvious how it all works. If you run into problems lemme' know and I can snap some more shots of my spare lockout etc. I really need to redo mine...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said - I really need to REDO mine. Currently my spring is too weak. "Specs"? I picked up my spring at the local hardware store and chose it from a rack of springs mounted on th ewall. I ended up trimming it's height some but otherwise it was out of the box. Pics on my site show the new spring as I recall.

http://www.blkmgk.com/development/testweb.nsf/4691e0edd8a01bd6852569ae0075e9c4/96b3c6baa6476ba685256ac00004f8d6?OpenDocument

 

0.7C?OpenElement&FieldElemFormat=jpg

 

The assembled spring there is the new one. WAY too weak nd I was in too much of a hurry to test it before bolting the trans in. Hopefully I can R&R it again without removing the trans - we'll see.

 

You actually do NOT have to unscrew the brass piece BTW. Snapring is in the end of the aluminum piece and sticks a nub into the trans that slows the reverse actuation. Hope that helps...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on how much room is in the tunnel. In my case I might be able to get at it from the top and drop it down - there's only one bolt holding it in. However my exhaust goes under there and I've got little in the way of tunnel hammering... How much room have you got up near th eshifter? The piece is oging to have to come out in order to be modified, I'm not sure about the trans itself.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not put power to it and use a switch to activate the mechanism? I have heard all these other ways of modifying but no one ever talks about using it the way it was intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a simple solenoid. Applying power to it retracts a pin and allows a MUCH weaker spring, not pictured, to be used instead.

 

Honestly, I DID consider using it as it was supposed to be used. I considered using a momentary button and I considered wiring it to the brake light switch. In the end I decided that a momentary button would be a hassle and that wiring to the brake switch would both add load and force the solenoid to activate quite a bit.

 

In a stock application I believe that it receives a signal that needs both brake pedal application and possibly the speed sensor telling the computer that the car isn't moving. Building a circuit to duplicate that was more complexity than I wished to pursue.

 

No other vehicle I have EVER driven has had to have these sorts of measures in place to prevent me from shifting into reverse. If the spring were simply stiff enough but not too stiff like the T5 setup then I think it would work fine with no electrical mumbo jumbo (shrug).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...