dr_hunt Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Hey DOC... so it's possible that the shaft-mount rockers I buy for the Performer RPM heads won't fit the AFR's I buy soon? zoddinlr, frprnfd on yrh hrsfd. That's code Im sure you understand, but yeah, depends on what heads you end up selecting. I believe the AFR 210's are standard valve spacing, same as the edelbrock performer rpm's. The 220's and 227's however are not and require offset stud girdles so the shaft rockers would be different as well. 195's would be a restriction on a big inch 434 motor but the new eliminator heads might be fine for a 406. It has been said before, plan and engine with the right components and build as much motor as you can afford, you'll never be sorry if you do it right and in that fashion. Your Hp goals are not that lofty and are attainable NA with the right parts. The more HP you seek the less manners you end up having. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 DOC... the Crower website shows that the AFR 210 intake valve offset is different. I think I'll have to wait until I'm ready for the 406 build. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 What about one of the following? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33624&item=8005242098 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33624&item=8052185395 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/PROCOMP-SHAFT-MOUNT-ROLLER-ROCKERS-CHEVY_W0QQitemZ180038120145QQihZ008QQcategoryZ107063QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jap tin Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Stay away from the CAT products. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jt1 Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 posted by japtin Stay away from the CAT products. Good advice. jt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_hunt Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Good advice. jt Excellent advice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 Okay... what about Procomp? Surely that's a better setup than stock rockers. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/PROCOMP-SHAFT-MOUNT-ROLLER-ROCKERS-CHEVY_W0QQitemZ180038120145QQihZ008QQcategoryZ107063QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 HOW ABOUT THESE... Set of Harland Sharp for less than $400... http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?part=CSP%2DSLS17&N=700+4294925232+4294924497+4294839886+4294908216+115&autoview=sku Do you think my mid/mild cam and the springs on my Performer RPM heads can take the 1.7 ratio?? EDIT: Hmm... looks like these don't fit Gen1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 Found another set. These look promising. What do you think? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ADJ-SHAFT-ROLLER-ROCKERS-CHEVY-327-350-383-400-1-6_W0QQitemZ8076308844QQihZ019QQcategoryZ33624QQrdZ1QQssPageNameZWD1VQQcmdZViewItem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.