Last night I took the cover off the new VR and drew out the schematic using my DMM to confirm continuity. I have come to the conclusion that Napa must have sold me an incorrect VR (the box was right, but the contents, not so). I have attached my schematic, along with what the FSM shows on page EE-12, and as you can see, they don't come anywhere close to matching up. One obvious thing is that the FSM shows 3 resistors, the Napa part has 2, but even more concerning to me is that the E connector (black wire) connects to all sorts of things in the Napa VR that the FSM does not show as being connected. I will return/exchange the VR later today and see how that goes. Hopefully I didn't fry my new alternator by using this VR. (I think I will pull it and have it tested just to be safe.) I have a question for all you 240 electrical experts out there... the FSM on pages EE11 and EE12 talks about how the VR functions, and it specifically mentions a warning lamp. The schematic on EE12 even shows the lamp, and it's being connected to terminal L. However, the body schematic on page BE5 does not show a warning lamp, and in fact shows that the L terminal on the VR is unconnected. My chassis harness has no wire to the L terminal (and it looks to be unmolested original equipment), so I am inclined to believe that page BE5 is correct, and page EE12 is incorrect. (Also, I don't see any sort of alternator warning lamp anywhere on the dash.) So, for you electrical geniuses out there, how trustworthy is the FSM schematic shown on EE12 in regards to the factory VR? Can I safely ignore the lamp portion of that schematic and trust that the rest is accurate? Thanks in advance.