Jump to content
HybridZ

BleachZee

Members
  • Posts

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BleachZee

  1. i obviously have to run some type of fuel control, would a 280zxt computer do it?

    No, the 280ZXT ECU does not take any modifications into account on the a/f ratios. The oxygen sensor makes very little adjustment for richness

    would i need that, plus a piggy back system?

    I don't believe there is a piggyback system. If you do a 1988-89 Z31 (300zx) turbo ECU then you have the option of having it reprogramed for those injectors. Then you would have to have it programmed again when you go with forced induction.

    would the injectors be over baring for a n/a L?

    I believe so. I think the factory NA injectors were 240cc (?) 440cc is very large

     

    All the work you mentioned could be done, minus the injectors and it should run fine until you're ready for a standalone ECU or Megasquirt to go along with the 400c injectors.

  2. With a timing light sure, advance to 24 deg and see how it runs for a while.

     

    Others mentioned they went more advanced. I never have. My old turbo I ran at 24 on premium. I was constantly having boost leaks even though the engine was stock. I wanted the extra protection...

     

    my recent car is a factory turbo. no leaks, all stock right now. I run mid grade but plan to do Z31 ECU (1988) and some other junk. Not sure what I'll do on timing. time will tell :D

     

    I highly recommend you get an Autometer manual boost gauge. They are much more accurate than the factory gauge.

  3. The 300ZX turbo has slightly higher compression than the 280ZX turbo so I would guess that is one reason the 300 timing is farther back.

    Also the 280ZX ECU is not very precise on the fuel map and runs a bit rich under any sort of boost or anything above 3000 rpm. The richness and low compression fights pre-detonation. (also meant to run low octane fuel) 300zx runs more lean but it is a more proper mixture for more torque and horsepower.

     

    If you're running high octane fuel only then it would make sense that you can run the advanced ignition timing. Listen for pinging though. Also, are you at stock boost right now? I would assume so since you made no mention of other modifications.

     

    I did read that 1988-89 300ZX had a smaller turbo, lower boost, but higher static compression. The ECU supposively pushes timing another 2 deg advanced under boost. You won't have to worry about this if your ECU is truely a 1987 though. 8-bit

  4. I've emailed that guy with the 280ZX 4x4 a few years ago. I think it was a Nissan 720 4x4 with a Z22 engine. Those are 6-lug hubs, same as all Nissan trucks.

     

    A truck has a IFS setup with a small R180 diff hanging under the engine. Not what you want for a low ground clearance car.

     

    If you can find an AWD steering rack like out of a Skyline that would be a good start.

    Then there's always the SR20DET like you said... Pulsar running gear. Nissan did make a awd Stanza but the drivetrain may not hold up to 200 foot pounds of torque. :D

  5. There was a narrow window of production years for the maxima (82-83ish? maybe 84?) that had a bolt-on bracket for the rear disc brake caliper.

    I believe that was the first year of that particular body style. 1981 only. 1982+ they switched to a welded bracket but I'm not sure the wagon was the same. The Maxima wagon might actually have rear drums since it has a solid axel.

     

    That generation of Maxima was 1981-84.

     

    also, the front struts and brakes look like the 280ZX style but they are not 100% the same. Brake pads ect do not switch out between them and a Z. Good only for core charges. :)

×
×
  • Create New...