That’s a fair point — I wouldn’t use this 1.5 mm Z-pipe as a primary header or turbo manifold either.
The intended use is downstream custom exhaust routing, where the main problem is packaging around existing components rather than supporting the turbine or collector. In that position, 1.5 mm stainless is a very different application from a manifold seeing direct turbine heat, concentrated collector stress and repeated flange loading.
The part is mainly useful where two pipe paths need to cross in a compact space. The printed junction gives a controlled internal divider and repeatable geometry, but it does not remove the need for proper support, purge welding and a good transition to the connecting tubes.
I agree with you on the manifold side: 321 and a thicker wall make much more sense for long-term durability, especially around the collector and wastegate. For the Z-pipe, I would still treat the actual vehicle, heat exposure, unsupported span and hanger layout as the deciding factors rather than claiming that 1.5 mm works everywhere.
Also agree on back-purging the manifold. Solar flux can be useful when purging is difficult, but I would not treat it as equivalent on a highly stressed turbo manifold. Fixture the flange during welding, control the heat input and check it flat afterwards — that is usually more important than the material debate alone.
Your point about ceramic coating and heat shielding is also well taken. On a street or competition car, shielding the master cylinder, wiring and nearby components is often more valuable than relying on the coating to survive indefinitely at the collector.