Jump to content
HybridZ

Toatl seal gapless second ring?


Guest iskone

Recommended Posts

IM useing them NOW in my 383, personally I don,t think they are worth the extra cost, while they work fine they don,t appear to be giving me and big advantage over good quality standard rings other than slightly better leakdown percentage readings but they seem to allow more oil to burn, nothing bad understand, maybe a pint every 3000 miles, but quality standard rings have done better,yes they are worth a few extra hp, but not worth the extra expence in my opinion UNLESS your racing and need every last hp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all Im saying is that I personally don,t think they are worth the extra expence for the results, they work fine but I have not found them in my opinion to be worth the extra cost, you will need to make your own decision,but getting a few3-5 extra ho for about $100 more is not really what Id call a great return on invested dollars, a cam or intake upgrade for that $100 would tend to give better results

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

 

While not a chevy or Z, I used them on the top and middle rings of my Formula V, as did/do?? a lot of V Racers. When you are talking about incremental horsepower increases (a National Formula V produces appx. 62 HP on the dyno), every little bit helps. When you're playing around with 355-360 Cu. Inches, you won't notice the difference as easily. As to whether the price is worth it in a chevy, that's a personal call, particularly when most of your increases come in large numbers, not a fraction of a Horsepower.

 

I can say that they were the difference between holding a draft on a National (pro built engine) car on the back straight at Moroso/Palm Beach International Raceway (PBIR) and having them walk away from my home built engine.

 

ecp48

Athens, GA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 502ZX

I agree with Grumpyvette. I have spoken with lots of racers regarding ring decision and most agree it is not worth the $$$ for the special rings and in some high RPM cases they can flutter and unseal. The latest "trend" seems to be a larger than normal (like 30 thou!) second ring gap used with or without a vacuum pump. The idea behind this is to release trapped pressure caught between the first and second rings which can cause sealing problems, particularly in nitrous/boosted applications. My ring recommendations are go with standard-style rings, if you don't mind the work and minimal extra cost go with a file-fit set and lean towards the tighter side of the manufacturers ring gap settings on the top ring for moderate performance applications. This has worked well for me in the past in some nasty engines.

 

My new engine is using the large second gap I suggested earlier and a Moroso vacuum pump, I'll let you know how that works out later this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...