Jump to content
HybridZ

SDgoods

Members
  • Posts

    216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by SDgoods

  1. Bumping this, there is so much misinformation going around,  this should be stickied,

     

    I am trying to figure out what gasket to use with my p90/F54.  The gasket that came off and the Ishino/stone gasket I bought (p79 I believe) block off most of the ports on the spark plug side of the engine, being the "oem" gasket.   

     

    Other than the 2 sentences stated in this thread: 

     

    Question,

    having the water holes on the exhaust side of the head ( less on the spark plug side), will this increase the amount of the water moving past that side of the head, and thus reducing the chance of spot boiling, and helping reduce heat faster ?

    Nigel

     

    I have not come across anything regarding those being blocked off.  Is this side of the engine the feed or drain portion?, as mentioned by TonyD,  which really matters where the restriction is. Understanding that the OEM is meant to block these ports off, the question is, will the older gasket benefit the head with opening up the spark plug side ports and will it seal with there being too many holes in the gasket?  (as verified by looking at pictures of the gaskets in relation to my head.)

  2. l28ET in 73 240z

     

    I found very little information regarding this valve.   It's the valve that connects the cyl head outlet (that goes to the heater core) to the Heater core outlet (that goes to the water pump),  and it allows water to circulate upon the engine warming up as opposed to just sitting in the engine itself and potentially creating hot spots.

     

    Now, This requires a fitting off the back of the head with 2 ports;  one port going to the heater core, the other going to the Y pipe that connects into the heater core outlet (and back to the pump)  The one that came with my car has one port, and when i got the car, the system was simply hooked up with lines going to the heater core and from the heater core.

     

    So, is this setup with out the radiator bypass valve safe to run? (lines going straight to and from the heater core)

     

    If not, is there a source for this radiator bypass valve (I cant seem to find one). 

     

    I'm really trying to get my stockish and relatively simple setup running as efficient as possible by doing things 'the right way', rather than simply modifying and hoping that it will work. 

     

    Any input would be great!

     

  3. This is exactly what I want, but are harnesses still "safe" attached to a bolt-in cage?

     

    Also, that looks like a Bride Zeta Type S, or an Exas III.

    The bar isnt going anywhere. What is your concern with the harnesses? When the bar comes out again im getting a rod welded in right there to keep them sliding laterally.

  4. I'm going to forget about the cage idea. I'm just looking for a really nice street car anyways. I was thinking 10 years from now, when I finish the Z, I'll tear down my foxbody and turn that into the race car. I like the style of the car, just not all the Ford engineering in it so I think it's a prime candidate.

     

    Why not get the best of both worlds and buy or build a quality roll bar?   This is my Custom 100% bolt in bar.  It does require 8 holes to be drilled through the rear fender wells, but it can come out at any time.

     

    IMG_0475_zpsa0dfe97f.jpg

     

    IMG_0479_zps8610e6e9.jpg

    • Like 1
  5. I think you missed the point---with all this time, you could have removed the block, stripped it, properly caustic dipped it, and reassembled it without ANY reservation about what was inside, outside, or left over!

    Could have, but didnt, dont have the space, tools, or budget. Workin with what I got, and i didnt ask for speculation on what i could have done. Thanks for your help though

  6.  

    The one I have is similar in that it also attaches to the wheel arch at a very similar position.  I'm 6'4 and have some recaros installed with a very low profile slider.  The bar doesn't impact my ability to move the seat back or recline.  In fact, the back of my seat hits the wheel arch before it comes in contact with the bar.

     

    I'd imagine it's possible to have a plate with slots in the top to have the camber plates being used, but I'd imagine they would need longer studs to clear the stock shock mount metal and the roll bar plate.

     

     

    It would be a tricky and unique setup to that car, but it could probably be done, and would certainly look badass. 

  7. Back to your original dilemma, to trust the shop, or to trust your faulty measurements: probably best to get the right measurements before you do anything.  You can't make a good decision until you know what you're dealing with.

     

    I agree, my mic is not cutting it, I'm going to use a friends navy spec/calibrated tool.   Ill post results when i get them

  8. I would doubt they cut the top of the head, then. I would imagine they decked the bottom and didn't cut the top, and just told you what you wanted to hear to get you out and not have to fix the mistake of forgetting to cut the top.

    What??? They cut the top. They removed the remaining studs (?) on the head that were able to stay on ffor the bottom to be surfaced

  9. Don't have an answer but curious if you mean that .005" is the range that you get measuring the same spot (your measurement error range), or if you mean that the head thickness varies by .005", from side-to-side, end-to-end.  They're both bad, one means you're not sure what your measurements really are, the other means the shop didn't keep things very parallel and/or flat.

     

    It must be my outside mic, it is probably not ideal for measuring the head.   it's difficult to get a perfect, flat reading the same everytime.   They are an experienced shop, and I do trust that they machined it flat, however,  i'm very confused as to how shaving ".022" from a head thats originally 4.248" ends up at anything more than 4.226".    If it were less, it would mean the head was previous shaved, or they shaved more than they thought they did.  In this case, either both of our tools are inaccurate or they didn't shave as much as they said.

  10. I just got my p90 back from the machine shop, who apparently took off .012 off the bottom and .010  off the top for a total of .022.  I bought .030 shims as I figured after .012 was taken off the bottom, about the same was off the top.

     

    Now, in measuring the head height, im getting as low as 4.235" and as high as 4.240".    According to a couple sources on this site, stock head height is 4.248.   I'm using a matco outside mic that was calibrated in 2011, and measured my .030 shims at .034  (not sure if the mic is slightly off or the shims).   4.248- 4.235 = .013" (????)    I was careless and didn't measure it before it went to the machine shop :(

     

    SO,  in order to shim the cam correctly, do I go off what the machine shop told me, and stretch the chain .008" with the .030 shim,  or closer to what my head thickness is telling me and shim a lot less?  The numbers don't add up to the actual thickness of the head according to my mic.  The machine shop measured is at 4.2345" (so it is accurate to my lowest reading)  

     

    Any speculation would be great, as i'm lost at what to do! 

×
×
  • Create New...