Jump to content
HybridZ

johnc

Members
  • Posts

    9842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

Posts posted by johnc

  1. The DP camber plates are a good option. No strut tower fab required.

     

    I used to charge $550 to section four struts. $650 if you wanted them powder coated.

     

    And I don't know where you're getting $800 for Koni 8611s. 8610s are around $210 each plus you have to source the gland nuts at $20 each - if you can find them. Last time I had to order 50 of the gland nuts to get Koni to bring them into the USA.

     

    Then there's the work to fit the 8610s/11s into the 240z strut tubes...

  2. I dont think you can run a sequential shifter on a trans with traditional synchrod. I think it has to be a dog box. I ran a Quaiffe Sierra sequential in my racing 240z. Wonderful! It was about $7,900 back in 2002.

  3. All else being equal never is. Another example:

     

    B Stock Solo2 RX8. You're limited to stock rim width. Same car, same driver. On a 18 x 8" rim the car was quicker on 245/35-18s then 285, 275, 265, 255, and 225 width tires. All the tires had an OD within 5% of each other. All testing done in the same place on the same day with retest to reduce variability.

  4. Tire compound is more important then tire width (a softer compound provides more grip). Tire temp is more important then tire width (a 205 width Hoosier R6 at 190F grips better then a 285 Hoosier R6 at 80F). Tire heat cycles are more important then tire width (a new set of scrubbed 205 Hoosier R6s grip better the a 285 Hoosier R6 with a years worth of races)... See the trend?

  5. You're not reading the posts by Blu.  I didn't charge $4,400 to install a set of customer supplied struts.  Typically it was about $200 per corner to cut out, measure, and install weld-in camber plates.

     

    The $4,400 you're quoting above was for a set of media blasted, inspected, crack tested, powder coated, shortened struts, Koni 8611 double adjustable shocks, threaded collar, adjustable lower spring perch, upper camber plates, upper spring perch, Hyperco springs, new inner and outer wheel bearings, media blasted, crack testing, inspected stub axles, seals, and everything completely assembled.

     

    Apples and oranges dude.

     

    And since I'm not selling those kits anymore, it really doesn't matter. 

  6. I had always assumed that the hub should be lined up with the centerline of the wheel, but apparently I had it all wrong and the roll center should be lined up with the centerline of the wheel.

     

     

    This makes no sense.  You're comparing a physical suspension component with a calculated abstraction.

     

    The main reson the Audi was faster up the hill was 4WD.  Hill climbs are generally low speed events (like an autocross) and thus reward accelerative traction.  Anything you can do to increase grip under acceleration will reduce your times.  Spreading grip around four contact patches gives you twice as much area for acceleration in a 4WD vehicle (given the same size tires).

  7. Never had an issie with my early 1970.  No creaking/groaning with how I built the STBs.  When I put the STBs in the car I also reinforced the upper frame horn to firewall connection (1970s S30 are pretty weak right there).  This allowed a 50 lb. in. increase in spring rate when lowered lap times.  Before the reinforcement that same spring rate increase let to no change in lap times.  The car did start cracking the chassis at the firewall, lower frame rail junction after I put in the triangualted STBs and the frame horn reinforcement.  Adding subframe connectors solved that problem and allowed an additional 50 lb. in. increase in spring rate to a final number of 375 lb. in. in front.

     

    You are reinforcing the strut towers to handle greater then designed for loads.  Once that area is reinforced, weaker areas of the chassis now start to deform as a result.   If you ignore that then you lose some of the benefits fo the original reinforcment.

×
×
  • Create New...