Jump to content
HybridZ

TC Bucket Relocate?


Guest Anonymous

Recommended Posts

Guest Anonymous

I'm starting frame rails and floor pans on what will be a track car.(240Z) I'm looking to get more than the 3 degrees of caster that came on the car. I have a set of adjustable TC rods but was thinking about locating the TC rod attachment points a little farther foward to increase caster and then adding shims or adjustable TC rods to fine tune to the desired setting. Any thoughts on this and has anyone tried this yet. I figure a little high school math to find the distance to move the attachment point and I'll be in the ball park as far as Caster goes. Thanks for your input.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing that BOZ moved the crossmember forward to lessen the amount of twist on the front control arm bushings. You would still need a longer TC rod if you were to move the crossmember.

 

The stock "bucket" is pretty flexy, and if you already have an adjustable TC rod with a rod end, it should be really easy to make a stronger mount from 3/16" plate or similar. Be careful of getting the angle wrong on the mount, or you will twist the end of the TC rod where it bolts to the control arm when the suspension goes through it's travel. I would suggest that you only move the mount if you have rod ends on both the control arm and the TC rod, then you should make your bracket and tack it in place, then bolt everything up without the strut in, and make sure that the suspension doesn't bind when it goes through it's range of motion. If you already have adjustable TC rods, it kinda begs the question of why you don't just adjust caster with them. Even if you wanted to make a better mount, you could still leave it in the same place, and lengthen the TC rod to get the caster.

 

HTH,

 

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a good idea for a track car. Moving the TC rod pivot forward and shortening the rod makes the static caster number look better but the dynamic caster number is much worse because the shorter rod describes a greater arc. You lose the built in negative camber gain in bump that's built into the 240Z fron suspension. You can also significantly increase stiction (at the lower control arm bushing) which reduces compliance. If anything, move the TC rod pivot back and lengthen the rod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I rebuilt my front chassis(tubular front end), I moved the pivot point up 3/4" and out 1/4", but did not move it fore or aft. I had already moved the pivot of the lower control arms by the same amount, and I noticed that the aluminum delrin bushings were in a bind. I have custom T/C rods with a rod end at the rear. To increase caster, I moved the top of the struts back 3/4".

 

album_pic.php?pic_id=626

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

Thanks for the input guys. I'll leave them where Nissan put them and stick to the adjustable TC rods. I love this place, it would have sucked to have to cut all that off and do it a second time. 74 5.0 sweet work! Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...