darom

Update: Today I worked on correctly setting up the initial target RPM table. Took two readings per each rpm step, in my case, 850, 950, 1100, 1200 and 1300, when the car was semi-warm and hot. Then added another 10 percent per: https://www.diyautotune.com/support/closed-loop-idle-pwm/ Then from 100 to 170, interpolated vertically. Since I didn't know what steps would be at lower temps, left them the same at the bottom: I switched to using CLT table (not MAT) since I am still clueless where I can find it (unless TS uses the same table for both and it will be just different temp ranges there). I also noticed at hot restart, the AFRs are very lean, 15-16 range due to the injectors getting heat soaked. Searched on the msextra, found some posts about guys using a band-aid fix by adding ASE and taper at higher temperature. I experimented with mine and added some: It does help somewhat in the beginning. I added EGO correction of 8 percent above 800 rpms. This helps as well, and my AFRs get back to normal range. I am posting my updated tune, plus the idle log. I haven't taken the car for a test drive yet. 2025-07-06-v106.msq 2025-07-06_10.40.07.mlg

Hi Tom! 1. I ordered another TPS sensor (different vendor) to test. I also noticed that it is not 100 percent stable. I am using the sensor ground for it per microsquirt manual and the 5V feed. My throttle blade is completely closed, the spring is strong in this Protunerz' throttle body. I do have a throttle cable slack. 2. I think what is happening at 16.833, is that for -200 rpm correction per the 'Idle Adaptive Advance Timing' table, it will kick 6 degrees of timing. My running RPMs are 996, when the target is 1200. So the ECU is adding 6 degrees to raise the RPMs. When the RPM of 1200 is matched, for ex., at 27.366sec, the correction advance is almost at 0 degrees, 0.6 actually. 3. At 26 seconds, i was backing out of the garage in reverse, with almost no TPS input. No sure what is happening here either. I also see a -280 RPMdot that follows. 4. At 93sec, there is a TPSdot of 14, maybe this is why my AE is enabled? My target RPM is 1183, the running RPM is 972, I see the Idle Correction Advance is adding another 6 degrees. I am wondering if I should move from 6 to 3 degrees max for CLI control? It might be too much of a change to adjust the RPMs? I will try that and will make another log. Overall, the CLI is the most confusing part for me. When it finally started working (kind of), it surely made my day :-) Appreciate you taking your time checking out my progress! I do have a few questions for you - per your tune: a. you have Shift Settings -> Leave Valve Closed Above:(rps) - 7,000, For this number of seconds - 0. Basically, you don't want the IAC valve to close at all? Any benefit from this setting? b. you are using the table for CLT in the CLI Settings (Use CLT or MAT In Table Lookup). Do you have any heat soaking issues? I read some posts where it was advised to use the MAT table. Any other benefits? Should I use the CLT table as well? I asked the question on the msextra forum why the ECU still checks the CLT table, but no one has responded yet: https://www.msextra.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=82151&sid=ccd10333b5cfba1911eaded17a655060 Thanks! Den

Update: I figured out why my RPMs were so low and the IAC wasn't adjusting its steps. My TPS in the Closed-Loop Idle PID Activation Settings, was set at 0.8. The actual TPS was 1.1 that day which meant that the CLI would never kick in when I was sitting in the car at idle. I re-calibrated it and decided to play it safe and set at 1.5. Today the car's CLI worked as intended. I am still dealing with wonky IAC which can be at steps 90 and barely allowing any air in. Also, I noticed that even if I select the MAT table to be used for reference, the ECU was still looking up the CLT settings. I posted this question on the msextra site, maybe it is a code glitch or this is how they designed it or I am missing another table. I might just use the CLT reference table and call it a day. I am posting the updated tune and the drive log. 2025-07-03_12.14.29-drive.mlg 2025-07-03-v104.msq

Update: replaced the mustache bar bushings, re-torqued the strut lock nuts. I don't hear any more banging noises now. Still not sure what fixed it though. When I was checking my rear Bilsteins with springs compressed, I didn't feel any extra movements to give me that noise. I also swapped my master, slave clutch cylinders and clutch hydraulic hose. The old ones had some 'brake fluid sludge' inside from the internal leakage. I adjusted the clutch pedal at 8 inches (i have a carpet/sound insulation), the master cylinder rod of the replacement unit was the same length, no need for an extra nut. I could put the pedal at the max height (over 9.5 in) and the rod was still good. The free pedal travel is within specs, 15 mm. I was observing the operation of the slave with my $20 endoscope, 15 mm of the clutch pedal before the slave starts its movement. The clutch fork throw is half an inch (12.5 mm). I could push the slave's rod back towards the front, the rod gets back to its self-adjusting position. I did some searching - it sounds like 15 mm is a better number. My reverse and 5th get engaged without grinding noise and without any difficulty. The clutch operation is smooth. I used Rockauto's Luk's: LMC245 and LSC199 parts. Appreciate your guys' help. After fiddling with my closed-loop idle, I am still chasing my tail. I posted a thread on the msextra.com forum at: https://www.msextra.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=82151 The RPMs get dropped very low, the ECU is not commanding enough steps for my IAC (or it is telling to give, for ex., 60 steps with not much difference). The car is driveable, but with rpms sometimes hitting low 300-400s, which is not good (CLI is not even running when it happens). Here is my updated tune and drive logs if anyone wants to take a peek. Thanks, Den 2025-06-29-v102.msq 2025-06-29-cold-start.mlg

Cool, thanks AtoZ! I will check the rod length, if needed I will weld a nut to extend it a little.

I set up the closed loop idle finally. This is the one of the best things since the invention of sliced bread. I still need to tune it, I will post my updated tune. I took the car for a test drive and noticed annoying loud rear-end noises going over any crack and pothole on the road. It is not clunking. My reverse gear is also hard to engage, I ordered a new clutch master/slave - it looks like the slave doesn't extend fully its rod, I think my clutch is dragging and my clutch pedal is out of adjustment. I will be replacing my mustache bar bushings and re-checking the torque of the locking strut nuts in the rear. Meanwhile, I decided to address my heat soaking issues with the intake, fuel rail and injectors. I found my old heat shield, bend it to contour the intake/exhaust ports and installed it. I checked with the remote temp gun, there is a 30F difference now (fuel rail/injectors were showing 170F):

I installed the new IAC, it seals the air bypass much better. It has a pointed tip (the Grand Am IAC is on the left, the right model comes with the Protunerz intake: I tried using Tom's tune idle air valve settings/steps (4-7-1, time steps + initial time step size + minimum steps to move), it worked on the bench in the beginning, but strangely once in the car, it refused to move and was stuck in one position. I put back my original (3-5-3) steps and it started moving. I am keeping 'Always on' setting as it works more predictably. I have a general question about these steps considering dozens of other combinations people use with their MS boards. Assuming the valve is the same, one car uses the Megasquirt board (dedicated IAC outputs) and another has a Microsquirt with the EFI Source's IAC stepper adapter (https://www.efisource.com/wp/shop/microsquirt-iac-stepper-adapter/), will the valve take the same steps in TunerStudio? I also tried both Homing Direction 'Open' and 'Closed'. The 'Closed' seemed to work better. The idle is stable. I found a set of informative YT videos at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z43YPcDGQEQ on setting up the CLI (closed-loop idle) and will play around with it this week.

Thanks for the tune! I ordered a new IAC mentioned on the efi web site, for 1992 Grand Am 3.3L V6 model, walker products 21591012 (Tom, appreciate the reference). It has a different sharp pointed tip vs the ones I have (mushroom shaped). My IAC can barely control the idle, letting a lot of air by (poor seating position inside the PTZ's intake). It is also sometimes unpredictable - one day it will set the idle at 900ish, the other - over a 1000 rpm. I will update the thread once I install it.

Thanks, Tom. The idle is smooth/predictable, without any oscillation. 1. WUE is changed per your config. I set it at 175F. 2. I left the EGO correction above 1300 rpm since my original thought was to prevent it from making changes to my VEs keeping a specific AFR there (13.5 - I am running batch injection, engine runs great with a healthy vacuum). Should I lower the EGO rpm limit from 1300 to 1100? I am still fiddling with the IAC stepper to lower my initial warmup idle. It jumps to 1600 rpm, I might move it to 1300 rpm by cutting the number of stepper steps. 3. Adjusted my ASE settings (percent/taper) I noticed that when the engine is hot, and I restart, my AFR is about 14.7-15 during the first 30-45 seconds. Then it goes back to my 13.5-13.9. Should I leave it alone or instead (this is my OCD is 'talking'), increase my ASE percent adder to a higher number to add a little more fuel (for ex., at 175F, from 9 to 15)? I will take the car for a test drive this week-end, will do a data log. Appreciate your suggestions! 2025-05-27-ASE-changes.msq 2025-05-27_17.45.45-hot-restart.mlg 2025-05-27_17.33.07-cold-start.mlg

Thanks Tom for your recommendations. 1. sync loss - I noticed with my microsquirt (plus a few more guys on youtube), if I apply 'Burn' while the engine is idling, it would stumble/recover and will generate 1 sync loss error. I checked my driving log and didn't see any sync losses there. I am attaching my warm idle log, it doesn't show any errors either since I didn't apply any corrections. This stumble/burn issue might be related to microsquirt ECU limitations, I am not sure. 2. I re-adjusted my TPS while observing the throttle blade. Now I have 545 points in my throttle movement. The throttle blade is closed. 3. I set timing from 14.2 to 17 degrees. It looks like my engine doesn't mind, runs stable. 4. thanks for finding this TPS WOT curve - copied your settings. 5. my GM MAP sensor is showing 40 - 41 kPa at idle. I am at 873 feet in WI, which computes to 17.51 inHg. I got my mechanical vacuum gauge to double check - it was showing between 17 and 17.5 inHg (approximation). I feel much better. : -) 6. the lock/unlock option for sensors - I totally missed this one, it is locked now. I set the Top Dead Center a while back and confirmed it with my timing light (using 'Fixed' timing option in TunerStudio). I also re-adjusted my IAC valve steps per your tune. I will keep it as open-loop for now. I will do a data log for the car when the engine is cold. Appreciate the help! Den 2025-05-25_warm.mlg 2025-05-25-17degrees-idle.msq

Hi @Datsunpowers Tom! I appreciate your time posting your IAC setup here. I wish Protunerz would grind the sharp edges at their factory. I talked to them, they are aware of all this whistling business with their intakes. They are great guys and I got quick tech question responses from them. But the noise is an embarrassment to a pricey car part. I have a few questions for you: - Do you set up your throttle blade to be completely closed and then configure your IAC to provide additional air to get your target 750 rpm? I went over this subject on a msextra forum as well, and it appears there are 2 ways to do it. One is to open the blade a little and IAC completely closed at idle. Another - the throttle blade is physically closed and IAC is providing air for idling target speed. I went with the 1st option, since I couldn't get my IAC to provide predictable behavior. One day it would be idling at 900 rpms, next day - 800-850 rpm, another - around 1000 rpm. I figured the IAC's min steps and step size needed to be played with and per Madcaw's advice, I left it on 'Always On'. This helped somewhat. I also bought another IAC for a 1999 Camaro V8 (Ultra-Power AC162) to test (10$ special from Rockauto), but I haven't installed it yet. I suspect my IAC is not completely sealing the opening, thus these fluctuations. - Open-loop vs closed-loop question I removed my a/c a while back, and I have a 5-speed. I thought the closed-loop idle control is suited for the cars with big electrical loads (like electric fans, a/c compressor kicking in) or an automatic transmission. I have a belt driven fan. All my headlights are converted to using relays. I set up the open-loop since it was the easiest option. Would you recommend for my car to switch to the closed-loop idle control? If you don't mind checking my tune/idle and a driving log, I'd appreciate it. What are your car's specs? Can you share your tune? Thanks! Den 2025-05-18_13.51.43.mlg 2025-05-18-adj-IAC.msq 2025-05-10_11.12.19-driving.mlg

Thanks, calZ. I switched my throttle cable at the TB from the very top position to the bottom one. I also tried the middle one (not much success there). The car feels normal again.

Update: 12V for HALL sensor did the trick. I don't see any sync issues in the logs. Guys, I wanted to pick your brain on the throttle cable / TPS / accel. pedal adjustment (Protunerz 75mm throttle body). The way I did the adjustment is to press the pedal to the floor (full throttle) and make sure the throttle body blade was wide open. At this point, TPS gets configured in microsquirt at rest/open, all is good. My SX240 TPS is allowing the blade operation from closed to open position. However, I noticed that my pedal is super sensitive now. Slight press creates a sudden acceleration - I have to re-learn my clutch 'feel' again, I am afraid to burn it. For ex., checking the logs I am seeing: RPM TPS% 2925 27.4 3719 30.9 3282 20.9 2620 21.5 3616 25.9 3485 18.9 3395 26.8 Do these numbers look ok? @madkaw Steve, do you mind sharing how you adjusted your throttle cable? I am wondering if the new size of the throttle body (75mm vs the stock 60mm) is also throwing a wrench here. I re-used my stock accel pedal. Thanks.

Thanks. My only wish is that BlueSea relay box had extra 2 fuse protected circuits.

Hi Weber, this forum is a little slow I just went through the microsquirt installation on my 76. Here is the thread showing the location for the MS (RH side) and the relay board (LH): I separated 12V relay board wires from the ECU's to avoid any interference. I also didn't want to put the MS board inside the engine bay. Regards, Den

I swapped the HALL sensor's 5 vrf with a 12v feed. This time all the sync losses are of my doing. For ex., adjusting the AE or WUE tables and exiting the windows, causes the ECU/engine stumble (almost like burning the changes), which generates "a reason 2" sync loss. It might be a psychological effect on me, but the car seems to idle smoother with a 12v feed to the HALL sensor. I managed to lower the idle by putting 14.x timing degrees. Thanks to everyone who helped with my issues! Should I enable the Closed Loop idle now? I don't mind keeping the Open Loop, I am just looking for any benefits of CL vs OL. 2024-11-23_15.22.20.mlg 2024-11-23-before-VE-smoothing-out.msq

The shield is grounded at the microsquirt's sensor ground location. I might try the 12v feed to the HALL sensor. I recorded two logs while doing a warm-up enrichment autotune tonight. The 1st one picked up only 2 sync losses, the 2nd - 11. I'd admit I was committing the burn to ECU commands which I noticed causing some of the sync losses. But not all 11 of them though. I also don't see any sync loss 'consequences' on my engine running. 2024-11-22_16.45.52.mlg 2024-11-22_16.53.40.mlg 2024-11-22-adjusted-ASE-taper.msq

Yes, thanks. I am using a 1k pull-up resistor with the HALL sensor wire. I followed the msextra's microsquirt doc on its wiring. I also haven't played around with signal filtering in TS.

Thanks, Steve! I will put 4-5 min steps instead. I noticed that every day (here in WI, we were at 45-50F for the past 3 days), my engine startup/warmup bevaves differently. I had to fiddle with the VE table/timing to get a stable idle. It might explain this if my IAC is not predictable and can't keep its position. I have been doing some reading and it seems that 5v vref switch to a 12v feed for the HALL sensor most of time doesn't resolve a sync issue. I have an osilloscope and would try logging the HALL sensor's output. Would you recommend switching over to the closed loop idle mode or stay with the open loop? I have no a/c, the radiator fan is not electric.

Yesterday I drove the car with the autotune running. I started a thread on msextra about my sync loss issues at: idle/IAC question if someone has time to review my tune/datalog. Thanks

Hi guys, What should be my idle fuel pressure? I have been running a FPR set at 43 psi without vacuum attached, which translates to 35-36 psi at idle (440cc fuel injectors). Is this an ok FP for operating these injectors? I finally got my idle sorted out with the Open Loop mode. The IAC is a sob, makes annoying noises, and I don't trust it that it stays in the set position 100 percent (I set mine in Always On). The idle would occasionally dip accompanied with the IAC noise. I'd try getting another unit to test. Thanks! 2024-11-12-good-idle.msq

Protunerz got back to me and suggested dremeling the edges off in the throttle body. First I tested it while pointing my air compressor's nozzle at it and it made the annoying noise. Removed the throttle body and took sharp edges of openings with a dremel tool: It passed the air compressor test. After installing it, the noise is gone 80 percent, there is still some noise when the throttle blade opens up.

I found out that the IAC plug in my throttle body is actually leaking air, possibly causing this RPM increase. I sent an email to Pro Tunerz asking if this is intentional or if their plug should be sealing the opening 100 percent.

yes, same problem it seems with these intakes. I used a thin layer of Permatex Ultra Copper, the leak is stopped, i checked with my smoke leak detector. I fixed my timing table (more conservative numbers), re-calculated my Bosch 0280155968 injectors flow at 36 psi (without vacuum it is at 43 psi), and re-generated my VE table using the built-in TS calculator. 43.5 PSI (3 BAR) 430 cc / min = 41 lb / h Calculation: old/original fuel pressure = 43.5 New Fuel Pressure = 36 Size of Fuel Injector in lb/hr = 41 New flow/Size of Fuel Injector = 37.298 lb/hr or 392.01 cc/min The IAC is disabled, the valve opening is plugged. I can't re-check the idle startup with engine cold at the moment, but when warmed-up, I can't get the RPMs lower than 1.5-2k. The only air leak is at the throttle body with the blade which is barely open (if I close it more, the car dies). The engine's vacuum is at 15-16 at the 1500 rpm. My valve cover vents the gases via a small filter. The PCV valve is connected and operational. If someone has time to review my tune with a datalog and tune for any issues, I'd appreciate it. Should I proceed with turning my IAC on at this point? Or I need to test the cold startup before going with the IAC enabled? Thanks. PS With the throttle blade barely open, the car is making a loud annoying whistling noise. With IAC installed, the blade will be completely closed and this nonsense should stop, I hope. CurrentTune.msq 2024-10-27-no-IAC-VE-inj-changed-calculated-flow-7.mlg

Replaced the MAP sensor, it is properly showing the kpas now. I have a bad air leak around cylinder 1, protunerz intake didn't seal the gasket. I did install it following the torque specs and order. While running, the air leak was audibly noticeable. I removed the intake, and didn't see any warpage. Ordered a new gasket. With GM IAC installed and in a closed position, the throttle body is making high pitched whistling noise. I guess the shape of the opening for the valve makes this bad harmonics issue. I also noticed my fuel pressure was around 50 psi. Adjusted the FPR, it is around 40-43 psi now.