Jump to content
HybridZ

Anyone Running Boost on F54 Flat tops and P90 Head?


z-ya

Recommended Posts

I had an L26 (flat tops) with turbo a long time ago. It was fine up to 10 psi. Detonation ended up killing it when I got greedy with the boost. Knock is the limiting factoy not HP of boost.

 

Agreed, keeping detonation at bay is the ticket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I run between 13 and 15 psi with the stock turbo pistons and P90 head and haven't had any problems.

 

I feel the datsun L28 is prone to detonate as compared to more modern engines. Nissan engineers set the compression ratio to 7.4:1 with 7 psi of boost for a reason and I feel jacking the boost up to 14 or 15 psi is pushing the stock design enough. Using the NA compression ratio with double the factory boost level is asking for trouble. It is like sleeping with both sisters, I'm not saying it can't be done, but needs to be done very carefully. hahaha

 

I would pick one or the other: Stock cr with more boost, or more cr and stock boost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies.

 

It's going in a track only car that needs to be reliable for long durations of boost. For that reason I will probably only run 7psi. I figure that should give me close to 200HP at the wheels. It will be intercooled, and will have Megasquirt driving Ford EDIS.

 

It's a budget racer so forged pistons are out of the question.

 

I thought the F54 flat top piston design was the same as the turbo, except that the turbo pistons are dished. Is this true, are the ring land sizes the same?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm running (and have run) up to 21# on my 77 L28. It is a JDM engine using an N42 head, that was 8.5:1 CR from the factory (Cedric Company Car).

The engine has not missed a beat, and I got it with 42,000Km on it. Normally I am running 17psi, but for a short time broke several turbos quickly running 21psi using a JDM .43AR turbine housing...

 

I did stupid things when I was younger.

 

Anyway, at 17psi, there has been no problem since 1987. I am pulling the engine whenever I return home to put in a higher boosted Megasquirted EFI system fueld engine. Right now it's old school blow-through Mikuinis... Ehay!

 

I know it's not F54 flattops, but they are JDM FLat Tops, and the CR you are concerned about. From what I understand the N42 is a little more knock prone than the later heads, too, so that should relieve your stress a bit, too!

Good Luck with the build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've pulled lots of pistons.

As far as I'm concerned there is little to no difference between Turbo and N/A pistons. Before you all go off let me try and explain what I have examined.

 

The Pistons I've pulled from L28ET(F54) engines are almost EXACTLY the same as dished L28 pistons from say an N42 block. There is a small difference just under the wrist pin that was enlarged slightly. It is otherwise the same. The flat top(F54) pistons are just a slight variant. The difference is that simple. Flat Top and Dished. As far as I can tell one is not weaker than the other. The ring lands seem to the naked eye to be the same. I have pictures I was going to post at a later time. If you want to bother e-mailing me I will send them to you. As you have read though. The stock pistons can handle a bit of power when executed properly.

 

Stock L28ET boost was set at 4PSI of boost. The end of the Guage past the red area would be 7PSI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turbo pistons have different size ringlands. Check the part numbers for ring sets for an early dished N42 block and then for a later turbo F54 block. The sizes are different, and the dished turbo piston has a thicker ringland than the dished non-turbo piston.

Also, if you put a mechanical gauge on there and not try to read the crappy stocker, you'll find that stock boost is 6-7 psi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone had posted that the late flat tops had a thick top ring land like the P90 turbo pistons. I have never seen them first hand though. The rings a re the same thickness. I know turbo rings usually use a ductile top ring. Maybe the N/A's just use a plain cast ring making the pn's different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could have sworn that I read somewhere that the factory turbo pistons were made with a different Silica formula than the NA pistons for the exposure to detonation ??

Also that the upper rings were not thicker just hard chromed ??

I could be wrong...........any rebuttles veteran Z fans??

.......................Vinny 8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the material is different on the turbo pistons, but I don't really see a reason why the nissan engineers would go through so much trouble for a 7.4:1 cr engine with only 7 psi of boost. Not exactly a high output situation. I could be wrong but I feel all the factory L28 pistons are made of about the same stuff. If anything, the aftermarket pistons are most likely a cheaper/weaker material as compared to the factory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing the dish piston I pulled from my 77 280z N42 engine to the Piston pulled from my 83 280ZXT engine...

 

The top ring land was smaller on the turbo. I can't find a mic to check it, but the N42 dished piston is approx 1/3 bigger than the Turbo top ring! I don't have a flat top F54 to compare it to. Just thought this might be a bit interesting for you guys. I would have thought it the other way around as explained earlier in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...