Jump to content
HybridZ

MS&S-E + Techedge WBO2 = GREAT!!


Xander

Recommended Posts

This weekend I finally finished my new setup and it works great.

 

I have a regular compression f54 block, P90A (non hydraulic) head, Z31 Turbo with a modified downpipe, Saab 9000 Intercooler, 60 mm TB, 370cc injectors with dropping resistors.

 

As a rpm pickup I installed 3 magnets in my flywheel with a hall sensor mounted on the sandwitch plate between the block and trans. The distributor is fixed in place and is now no more than just a distributor.

 

As a start I loaded the moby injection and ignition maps (thanks Moby). After adjusting the req fuel setting it ran just fine.

 

Then I installed my TechEdge WB02 sensor. I am using the WBlin and feeding it into the O2 input of the megasquirt unit. As a bonus I connected the Narrow band simulated output of the Techedge to a dash mounted afr meter.

 

I set the Air/Fuel ratio target map to run about 13:1 on boost and 15:1 when cruising.

 

Then I went for a drive.

 

 

AMAZING!!!!

 

This thing just goes and goes. The Wideband takes care of the fuel map for now and everything looks great. I am now using the datalogs to adjust the fuel table.

 

datalog2.jpg

 

If you look to the right of the white line you can see a full throttle acceleration. Boost is set to 7 psi. When the boost comes on you can see a spike of the afr to 10:1. Then the closed loop target afr system start to adjust the mixture to 13:1. It adjust the mixture to about 90%.

This tells me I have to adjust my fuel maps about 10% leaner in that area.

 

Great! And all this for a DIY system.

 

I can highly recomend this combination of MS&S-E and the Techedge wideband controller. For a total price of less than $500 you can have a fully programmable fuel and ignition system with closed loop wideband monitoring. That is cheaper that the basic SDS system and you get more stuff to fidle with.

 

I had a bit of a race with a 300zxTT (z32) and after I jumped about two car lengths on him at the start he still couldn't catch up to me. This was at only 7 psi. Granted the owner of the z32 couldn't drive to save his live but still I fully expected for him to catchup to me and it just didn't happen. I'll try to get it dynoed in the near future.

 

Zya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say that what Xander dedscribes is EXACTLY the scenario that Electromotive TEC2 used---you would set your map, run on the WBO2 that was incorporated in the system, and then datalog the correction offsets to refine your fuel plotting.

 

As an aside, the TEC2 had 8X8 spark and Fuel maps.

 

It also cost $1700, BARE, in 1999 dollars!

 

I would agree, for the money outlay, the Megasquirt especially now with the 12X12 Maps!) is HARD TO BEAT! I have recently taken apart the Period-Correct ECU from an original 81ZXT. I think the hype over "automotive grade componentry" in the ECU is really overblown. The stuff in the FACTORY ECU is all "consumer grade" stuff, and they lasted well over 20 years.

 

I am more convinced now that the Megasquirt is THE alternative to replacing an ailing EFI system in any of the early cars. It is, INDEED, a clear STEP UP even if you onlyrun the fuel program on an 8X8 map!

 

Congrats, Xander, nice datalog. Keep us posted. Tell Frank to get his working now! LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I built the tech edge unit and it IS harder to build than megasquirt is. There are more components and the instructions were harder to follow. I also had a short on the pcb itself which made troubleshooting hard. Hopefully they don't have those issues anymore with their pcbs. If I had it to do over again I would just buy the LM1 unit. IMO, the tech edge unit just didn't save enough money to make it a worthwhile DIY project like megasuirt does. But if you want experience soldering it is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell Frank to get his working now! LOL

 

LOL. That's what I keep telling him! This spring he was telling everyone that he would get his car finished in the summer. Yesterday he was telling everyone it will be finished in the winter. But he is a working guy now. so he doesn't have that much time to fool around with cars anymore.

 

did you guys buy the TechEdge unit pre-built or did you build it all yourself?!

 

If you build a megasquirt and got it working than the techedge is only a small step up in difficulty. I build it myself also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things that can go wrong with tuning your ms&s-extra:

 

compare this picture with the one in the first post.

 

datalog3.jpg

 

the A/F ratio in the first is off. This one is better. The logviewer was set to nonlinear air fuel output. But I am using the linear output. Another lesson learned.

 

another thing that went wrong:

 

When seting up your timing. You set the timing (for example) to 20 degrees advance. If the mark on the front pulley is off then adjust the trigger angle. After this was set I forgot to set it back to using the tables. I was driving around with a fixed 20 degrees of advance! I Thought the car didn't feel quite as it should be but I didn't find out what it was for about a 100 miles. :banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong here (have been before and will be again), but:

 

It seems to me that if you were at 10:1 at full throttle, that you need to adjust your settings 10% LEANER, rather than richer.

 

I started reading all the MS threads because I'm about to get a V3 MS board and MSns_Extra setup and harness from Rodney, and I'll admit that it is as bit overwhelming to start with.

 

If I am wrong, please show me the error of my ways so that I can adjust my thinking and go back and reread the pertinant basics again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I installed my TechEdge WB02 sensor. I am using the sVout and feeding it into the O2 input of the megasquirt unit. As a bonus I connected the Narrow band simulated output of the Techedge to a dash mounted afr meter.

 

I'm curious why you're using the sVout output on the Techedge and not the WBVout? Or is this an older version of the Techedge?

 

I also had a short on the pcb itself which made troubleshooting hard. Hopefully they don't have those issues anymore with their pcbs. If I had it to do over again I would just buy the LM1 unit. IMO, the tech edge unit just didn't save enough money to make it a worthwhile DIY project like megasuirt does.

 

Moby... I've built 3 Techedge 2AO DIY kits and didn't have problems with any of them, so if they did have issues with them, they would seem to have been resolved. I've been very happy with mine, and I figure I saved at least close to $200 over the LM1. That was worth it for me. But I've heard nothing but good things about the LM1.

 

Nigel

'73 240ZT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me that if you were at 10:1 at full throttle, that you need to adjust your settings 10% LEANER, rather than richer.

 

your right, Thats what I did. I wrote it down the wrong way around. Good observation! I'll edit it soon.

 

 

midnightzxt:

 

The run was from about 3000 to 5000 rpm. I didn't take it higher than that because the engine had only about 200 miles on it and I am still taking it easy.

 

RPM and MAP should not match the TPS. TPS is at 100% = full throttle. Then rpm is rising at a steady state and boost (MAP) Comes on a tad later then the TPS rise (boost lag). As you can see at 3000 rpm boost lag is minimal.

 

Nigel:

 

Raw (uncalibrated) IpDrive voltage WBVout - Pin 7

 

This is the raw voltage output of the WB02 processor's Ip drive circuitry. The wideband software, and the pump cell's internal Nernst voltage itself, determine this voltage. This signal is not that useful for connecting to external circuitry and the voltage level itself cannot be calibrated (as can the other output voltages).

quoted from the WBO2 site.

 

thats why I don't use the WBVout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am using Wblin. In my first post I corrected it but you must have read it before I edited it.

 

Megasquirt can be setup to use WBlin or SVout

 

SVout has a range of 1.3 to 3.1 volts.

 

WBlin has a range of 0 to 5 volt.

 

WBlin theoretically has a better resolution. I doubt if it will be noticable.

 

I read somewhere that you can adjust the lookup table for the NBsim output. I am thinking of rewriting it to be a linear "curve" between 0 and 1 Volt and afr of 14.7:1 at 0.5 Volt. That way my narrowband meter can be used to read the afr directly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, im confused by the wb02.com site... its in au dollars... is that where you got it from? is it sent from australlia?

 

Did you build the 2A0? and which o2 sensor did you use?

 

and my last question, the pre assembled kits come with "misc" stuff... what are these miscellaneous things? If i buy the kit, sensor, connector, and display, am i going to be missing something???

 

thanks!

 

-Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...