Jump to content
HybridZ

Just checking a theory...


naviathan

Recommended Posts

I've been tuning the hell out of my car over the last two weeks. I started with it running lean in the upper RPMs. I've adjusted the AFM so many times I could probably map the the internals out in my sleep. But I finally got it to stop detonating above 4500rpm (result of the super lean condition). Of course it took forever to find a happy medium between idle, cruise and high RPM mixtures with the AFM (anyone have a colortune they'd be willing to sell cheap?). Now I've got that all set, but my idle seems to surge. For instance, coming to s stop light, the rpms drop, it sits a little high for about 10-15 seconds (900-1000rpm BCDD I assume). Once it drops back to 750-800 rpm it will surge randlomly dropping down as low (and this is the low) as 500rpm coming back up to 850-900 then back to 750 back to 850 down to 500/600 back up. I'm thinking she's a bit lean at idle. I might have the AFM air bypass screw out too far. Just looking for other expert oppinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realize the AFM has absolutely nothing at all to do with fuel delivery above 3500rpms, right?

 

To tune fuel delivery above 3500rpms, the only practical method is fuel pressure.

 

Normally the methodology is to stick incrementally larger injectors in the car, and tweak the AFM spring tighter so your idle and light cruise is 'leaner' in the stock ECU, but once the cam kicks in at 3500 and starts flowing air (and the AFM is wide open by then) you go solely on the pulsewidth generated by the preprogrammed curve in the ECU combined with the larger injectors to give more fuel on the top end...

 

Wind the spring too tightly, and indeed you set up a condition whereby the ECU gets confused signals, throw in the 35% open "Full Throttle" TPS switch and you get even more ECU confusion.

 

For $400 and two hours of hacking, the MS will cure this Bodge-Job of Bosch Nightmare-Tronic!

 

The idle air bypass screw will skew the AFM trace through the off-idle to 3500 rpm range. Close it further, and your 3500rpm point will change incrementally. while you richen the idle by not allowing more air to bypass, you thn move the AFM flapper to an incrementally different position at the same time...

 

"54KPA, 700RPM, Shift-ARROW UP, ARROW UP, ARROW UP, ARROW UP Check O2 Feedback, .7V, next load block...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll check the fuel pressure again, but I don't believe this is the problem. Of course today I've come across another issue. I'm losing coolant somewhere and can't figure out where. There's no oil in the coolant or coolant in the oil so I can't imagine it's getting in the cylinders, but I'm not finding any evidence of leaks either. This whole car needs to be gone through and checked over. Gee it's only got 216,000+ miles on it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony, I thought it was true as well that the AFM doesnt do anything above 3500rpms. Although When I tested this.. I got something different. using 311CC injectors I tested the stock AFM. at wot and 13psi I was getting a nice 11.8 air/fuel, I then tightend the spring 5 teeth. and then was a nice 14's cruising and when I went WOT it was leaning out bad. I returned the afm back to stock and it runs like it did before. Nice 11.8-12.0 at WOT.. but cruising is around 13's or so. I sure cannot wait to play with MSnS..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, if you tighten the spring too tightly, and the ECU gets funky signals and doesn't process them right. Tightening the srping RAISES the RPM whereby the ecu reverts to "preprogrammed" WOT injector pulsewidths. You experience confirms this....eventually your AFR's should have gone back to the same 11.8-12.0 when the Flap reached the 'full open' position.

But if it doesn't reach that by the time the ECU reaches 3500rpm, where it's SUPPOSED to go back into open loop regardless....

 

See what I mean about confused ECU?

 

There is a fine line between this tweak and that tweak, and in many cases, simply because of the way the system is designed, you can't adjust just ONE variable at a time---you end up affecting more than one because of the way the program interacts.

 

What you need to realize is that while the flap is in play, and the O2 sensor is active (if you don't have a heated O2 sensor on the ECCS this may never happen) the O2 sensor wil ltrim another 10% out of your fuel. As long as the injectors you added did not exceed the 10% range this should occur. You can NOT adjust to 14.7 by the AFM, it has to be slightly RICH and the O2 sensor has to do the final trim or it will never work.

With the size injectors you have you are supplying 15% more fuel than stock, juuuuust outside the O2 sensor's range. Did you try only two or three clicks, and make sure your O2 sensor feedback loop was being enabled? (The flashing lights under the ECU?) If the O2 sensor is not working, the ECU will default to the 'safe' program, and that only compounds the issue. If it sees rich for (I forget the number) X cycles or seconds, it reverts to the failsafe map---which isn't the greatest under boost. If you are cruising at 13's the O2 sensor is dead, try replacing it with the heated type from an 87 Z31 T and try tweaking a bit more. Those mods aren't so bad they would disable the O2 circuit, you are right on the edge of plug-n-play actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony, so if I have a friend hold my engine at 3500 rpms and adjust the AFM so it hits the end point of the wipe pattern right there it should be set correctly at that point right?

 

 

It would have to be WOT, under load. You can measure the voltage when you drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On an N/A car it should come to 3500 and that flap should be wide open regardless of load. On a TURBO car, then, YES---then the car must be under load for the turbo to load up fully and suck the proper amount of air to "pin the flap".

 

Like I said, the systems all interact. If you are trying to avoid work DITCH the stock system. To tweak it closely and properly is FAR MORE effort than the couple of hours needed to hack the harness and install the MS-n-S, AND TUNE IT FOR BETTER THAN STOCK DRIVABILITY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point, yeah, WOT. I don't think it's a viable way to test it anyway.

 

Like you mentioned, getting onto a hill, with a VOM and piercing probes in the correct wires, and going WOT in fourth gear will creep you up to the point where you can read the correct voltage.

 

Nobody said tweaking the stock system was easy, right? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point, yeah, WOT. I don't think it's a viable way to test it anyway.

 

Like you mentioned, getting onto a hill, with a VOM and piercing probes in the correct wires, and going WOT in fourth gear will creep you up to the point where you can read the correct voltage.

 

Nobody said tweaking the stock system was easy, right? LOL

Yes this I understand. The stock system is far from easy, but I don't have the money to keep the MS2 system I just built. It's gotta go and quick so I can pick up a couple more kits to sell. Anyone looking for one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...