Chickenman Posted January 22, 2018 Share Posted January 22, 2018 1976 Nissan Comp Catalog. Note Part # 13001-E4651. Big $$$ even in 1976. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DATZ Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 On 1/11/2018 at 12:12 AM, Gollum said: You mention that the chambers were welded, how much quench pad is there? If a lot, then a thicker gasket might be hindering more than helping. Google quench pad and quench distance to learn more. Also, pics are always nice. It’s hilarious how everyone throws out the term “quench”. This head has the best quench”, “if you do this, you’ll get more quench”…. Here’s the rule: if quench isn’t perfect, YOU DON’T WANT IT! When you’re raising compression, Quench is the primary cause of detonation - when it’s not perfect. There is ZERO quench pad on the E31, E88’s, N42, N47. The P-79, P-90 and MN-47 all have quench pads. The E31, E88, N42 and N47 are considered “Open” Combustion Chambers; Where the P-79, P-90 and MN-47 are considered “Closed” combustion chambers. “Open” combustion chambers have little to no quench pads. The reality is, none of the Z heads have great “quench.” So don’t worry about it. Now that’s not to say BPE Heads, Rebello’s…. Can’t weld up any of these heads and create perfect quench. It’ll just cost you money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewZed Posted March 1, 2022 Share Posted March 1, 2022 Also hilarious when somebody joins a forum for the sole purpose of criticizing another person's post. Even funnier when they don't offer any sources or even a clue about who they are. Just another voice in the wind. Hear my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuffyMahoney Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 On 1/10/2018 at 7:47 PM, Nismospek said: Found a nifty calculator. Decided to convert everything to 25 inches which is what I believe Rebello uses. 100 lift 58 cfm 200 lift 117 cfm 300 lift 158 cfm 350 lift 178 cfm 400 lift 189 cfm 450 lift 192 cfm 500 lift 200 cfm 550 lift 205 cfm 600 lift 213 cfm 650 lift 219 cfm Mine actually flowed the best at .500 lift. 235. Interesting that his flows higher as lift goes up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony D Posted May 10, 2022 Share Posted May 10, 2022 On 3/3/2022 at 1:26 AM, DuffyMahoney said: Mine actually flowed the best at .500 lift. 235. Interesting that his flows higher as lift goes up. Not really, until the valve head is away from the seat more than a given ratio to it's diameter, it represents a flow impediment. On a ported head capable of flowing more, the further away that valve head needs to be to not impeded the inward rush of airflow. Since the valves are relatively large, compared to a DOHC Valve and do not tilt inward away from the cylinder walls like a Pent-Roof DOHC again... it represents a "shrouding" of the valve. This is why people cut the heads combustion chamber in the area of the valves... it 'unshrouds' the valve at low lifts and represents a considerable amount of flow increase (ESPECIALLY on Turbocharged/Supercharged builds) given the assymetric nature of the cam profiles used on Nissans and their time spent 'just off seat'. If he's got large ports, it only stands to reason that higher lift gives more flow. If the porting is conservative, you will hit a wall and not flow more regardless. Even at that, you can still use a higher lift cam as it will spend more time "under the curve" at the peak flow number with no restriction at all than if you used a cam that only lifted to the max your head was capable of flowing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.