RTz
-
Posts
2943 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
23
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by RTz
-
-
I think everyone agrees... there is a high pressure zone at the windshield base/cowl. But, the question is, is there a *higher* pressure under the hood? In my limited experience, there is. As was mentioned, its relative.
-
You know how these BMW guys can get!
Sure do
Nice job Tim!
-
Here's a series of photo's taken with a P&S Olympus C8080... the camera I ditched before buying the D70. It looks like HE figured out how to make it work
http://www.jessespeer.com/photography/photo_journal/2004_06_TetonGlacier/index.html
-
Good stuff!
-
I guess it's time to replace my Coolpix 4500. Maybe I'll go all-out and buy a really nice DSLR with an array of decent lenses. It may help take the pain away from selling all my large format gear:)
Yes Mike... you should
BTW, inquiring minds want to see a few samples of your work?!?!?
P.S. When do you suppose digital medium format will hit the market?
-
Taken with D70s, On final, Troutdale OR, KTTD, Ron Tyler in the left seat…
You captured my best side
-
A word of caution with that style... all the engine (and some transmission) loads will now be acting on the frame rails. In the stock configuration, the crossmember handles the bulk of the (engine) loads, avoiding nearly all of the stress on the frame rails.
If you're going to use that style of mount, I would recommend structural reinforcement of the rails.
-
...and I thought you were gonna discount the ISO noise?
-
...It's a mantra, repeat it often while contemplating it in the lotus position on the roof of the car.... It will come to you eventually: Too much spark and not enough fuel is bad CARma.... Get it? LOL!!!
-
That shot is... well... um... DAMN!
-
-
I haven't shopped for DSLR's in years but I can only assume that they have corrected this design oversight. Did they?
Mike,
Yes, they are addressing that problem, albeit a little expensively (and slowly). Google Nikor 12-24 and 18-200. Expensive but impressive.
-
Ron, yes my DSLR turns on in less than half a second by tapping the shutter release button no matter what mode it is in. But, I might have to take it out of a protective bag, take off the lens cap, maybe change the lens, double check that I didnt leave it in ISO 1600 or something, and make sure it's in Program mode, is the lens switch set to manual or auto....so all that said, I can still be beat by a credit card sized point and shoot that is in someones front pocket with a 5x optical zoom no brainer.
Hi Dave,
Probably irrelevant at this stage but I thought I'd mention it. I see some difference in our habits. I'm lazy. You're probably more of a perfectionist. I don't like fuss. I own a tripod, but hate using it... too much trouble. I don't use a camera bag... never found one that didn't require 'energy'. My camera is dusty. I don't mind, it still works well
I own only two lenses... a fair, versatile zoom for everyday use and a long lens for that 'special' occasion. That said, my 'appropriate' lens is always mounted. See what I mean? I'm lazy. On the other hand, my camera is always 'ready to go'. My habits, however unimpressive they may be, allow me to have fun, focus on the moment, and quickly release the shutter -
digital zoom = cropping (nothing more)
Well said.
optical zoom is always better.
Again, well said.
check what type of batteries / charger (finepix goes a long time on plain AA's)
I typically get 500 to 600 pictures per charge... its convenient to say the least.
check what it's going to co$t to add on .. (lenses, etc...)
If we're taliking about the casual user, one or two, carefully chosen lenses will cover it.
figure out how often you're going to use it and price accordingly
Agreed. Just consider, if you use it with any regularity at all, there are some features that are worth their weight in gold. i.e., with kids, you never get any warning of what they're going to do or when. Frequently those moments are gone within 2 or 3 seconds... Some P&S's take that long just to turn on.
-
Maybe you guy's can help me out with something.
First, for clarification, Agyandaredhead titled this "really nice digital camera". Also, I'm getting the impression that maybe he can afford somthing in the $1000 range.
Here's where I need help... I've used a number of P&S's from three different manufacters (probably totaling 12-15). Every one of them had a long turn on time, eats batteries, slow focus, slow shot to shot, and lackluster metering. These are ALL things that are important to the casual user (or should be, ESPECIALLY with kids). Admittedly, I have intimate experience with only one DSLR. However, I can say without hesitation that it does a fine job in all these areas. Most DSLR's probably do. I'm not much of a photographer, but I have captured many shots with my DSLR that I could NEVER get out of a P&S. And furthur, its EAISER to use than any P&S.
The ONLY advantage to a P&S is compactness and price, but thats IT. I fail to see any other reason to own one.
I don't think you have to be a good photographer to appreciate a DSLR. On the contrary, I think it makes you look BETTER than you are
-
What about Top Gun?
-
Just keep in mind that, to make a SIGNIFICANT difference in image quality, you need to AT LEAST DOUBLE the pixel count.
Mike, Thanks for the informative post. I agree with the pixel count sentiment. With my last purchase I even went 'backwards'... going from Olympus's top line P&S (at the time C8080) with 8 MP, to the Nikon D70 with 6MP. Image quality is SO much better that you'd swear the Nikon had the MP edge. Its more than just MP.
Do you want easy point-and-shoot operation?
Here's where I'm going to have to dissagree with 'conventional' thinking... 90% of my pictures are taken in fully automatic. The D70 is flat out the easiest P&S camera I've ever used. The only drawback is its bulk (compared to the typical P&S). I thought this was going to bother me and that is partly what delayed my interest in a DSLR for so long. To tell you the truth, its such a delight to use, I rarely notice its larger size.
-
Casino Royale (that just came out) or Casino Royale (with Roger Moore)?
I haven't seen Roger Moore's version (I'll fix that), but Daniel Craig's is probably the best Bond movie in MANY years. Still ridiculous in many ways... even still, its a huge improvement.
EFI or Carbs?
-
Cheers
-
MILF or College Co-ed
MILF.
F1 or NASCAR
-
I love airplane photos.
Dave,
Between Braap and I, we have a few of those. Here's a couple to 'feed the need'...
My wife and I ran accross this unbelievably restored Piper Cub on our flight to Hood River. We talked to the owner a bit... terrific guy. He actually trained, solo'd, took his check-ride in it, and then had the humble-ness to show interest in the the Cessna we flew in!
.
.
Braap took this one last year while we were exposing a co-worker to flight...
.
.
-
Beautiful shots up there guys BTW!
I love this one:
Thank You Dave,
If it matters, its a Grumman Goose w/turbine conversion... taken 150 yards from my front door.
Here's a shot of same plane...
.
I *DIG* your dragon shot.
The best dragon shot I've got to date (taken with an Olympus P&S)...
.
-
I just ordered 62 kits!
Thanks for the heads-up!,
-
Mike,
Thanks for the reality check!... I, for one, need it from time to time.
S30 Aerodynamics not really that bad?
in Miscellaneous Tech
Posted
Dave,
I'll take a stab at this (thats all it will be). Generally, heat is transfered to air at the surface. For example, our weather comes from the sun heating the surface, the surface heating the air, the air becoming lighter and rising, etc, etc. The boundary layer is largely stagnant, yes? If you heated the surface enough, the boundary air would heat and rise, potentially upsetting the boundary layer.
My guess, though, is that its 'no factor' in our automobile.