Jump to content
HybridZ

Tony D

Members
  • Posts

    9963
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Posts posted by Tony D

  1. And praytel what exactly is silicone if not rubber. Silicone "RTV" anybody? "Room Temperature Vulcanization"? That is a rubber bonding/curing process.

    What is "SBR" (Synthetic Butyl Rubber)?

     

    Not coming from a Latex Producing tree doesn't mean it's not commercially classified as "Rubber"...

     

    "Silicone Rubber" is a common term. We aren't on the plantation in Malaya any longer... It's the 21st Century, you know!

  2. I never liked all the hassle to drop the pump after priming. It seems to defeat the purpose. A SBC you DO NOT drop the pump afterwards, hence it making sense to do that way. But "priming" then 'breaking the suction side open" kind of defeats the purpose IMO.

     

    A pressure pot of filtered oil to fill the engine through the oil sender point seems to work fine for me, no breaking of the suction, and immediate fire-up possible if you have a check-valve in the feed line from your pressure pot.

     

    There is a Japanese Source for blanks, with octagon turning lug on it. I have not quite gotten to the source of these new "JAPAN" blanks, but am working on it.

  3. I had a Japanese Flexible Shaft that was connected to a 3/4 horsepower electric motor (3565 rpm) with a shaft adapter. I found I had to bolt down the motor because I couldn't bog the motor to the capacitor centrifugal switch without it flipping off it's base and twisting the cord around the body pulling it out of the wall... I probably should not hog so hard....

     

    That Japanese Shaft was small, and came with a 1/4 and 1/8 collet insert. I have not found another like it since. I scour hardware shops in Asia looking to find a replacement as after 20 years of use I successfully separated the handpiece from the flexible wrapping of the shaft. So much better than the Jacobs Chucks on everything else. 

     

    The key to this shaft was it was 20,000 rpm rated. I hooked it to a Makita Grinder with another shaft adapter and it was beautiful. I paid $50 for it in 1987, likely $100+ now, but that shaft was beautiful! Could do anything I could do with a die grinder, but because the hand piece was maybe 12-15mm in diameter was like using an extended nose die grinder without the weight.

     

    I bought it and did the electric motor thing for the same reason: no air for the pneumatic stuff at home. Started with a washing machine motor, and moved up quickly as I found hogging aluminum with coarse bits was easy at 3500rpms when you can really bear down. WEAR SAFETY GLASSES! Those chips are SHARP and FLY!

     

    I have Several HF Electric Die Grinders now, bought on sale (when they have stock) and I chuck different tools in different grinders. Spreads the load over several grinders, making them last longer I suppose. But for the price...meh!

  4. Dude, that is exactly how the "Firebar" style Low Oil Level Switches work!

    I never knew this, but was familiar with the technology from work. Doubt I could use a Firebar, though---it heats similarly, and uses a thermocouple to sense the bar's heat...tripping a relay at 430F! Bit hot for use in the fuel system for my tastes! LOL

     

    This  makes sense, and sounds like a good way to retrofit to a car someone may be converting to EFI to give a warning similarly through an LED on the dash!

  5. Ray pretty much covers it. What the BAR says goes. Unaccountable and uncontestable. It's an interesting setup of collusion between federal legislators and local legislators, making an organization ostensibly for the public good, but above the law in many ways, unaccountable to the electorate.

     

    I fit EVERY requirement they made for my 73 to do a Pre-May 1984 Engine Swap (70 Engine in it), and in the end the BAR guy got on the phone, and said "NOPE" and that was that. I retorted the next time he saw me it would have an LS3 454 in it (this was 1991, btw...foreshadowning in a scary way!) and his response was a cheery "Oh we can smog THAT!"

     

    From that point onwards, until January 2013 I did not legally smog a single one of my vehicles. I was pressed  for time in January, and couldn't take the time to play around.

     

    My ire and vengance knows no limits...

  6. Exactly PMC!

     

    Instrumentation makes for understanding and quantification of what was formerly black art and intuition...or following hunches from close observation.

     

    The more we learn through quantification, the more we realize what we misunderstood but thought we knew.

     

    And in some cases, RElearning from someone who figured it out decades ago, died, and never passed it on. Lots of that in the English-Speaking Datsun Community to be sure. The 'apprenticeship' system in Japan isn't big on talking, but observation, and intuition. With instrumentation, their system assists in comprehension quicker for the close observer with good skills.

     

    Talk and tell someone something, and they will come back asking again because they really didn't 'learn' it. But have it as your own revelation...and you will remember the day you came to understand it like it was yesterday.

     

    "One day, this fly was on my carburettor, but didn't get sucked in. But when he took off to fly away, right down the barrel he went.... EUREKA!" 

  7. "Property State of California".... your tax rebate one sign at a time. For what they take from me, and the other 'benefits' I get....a sign here and there is a small recompense for the wasted dollars they milk from me every other week.

     

    Guardrails used in your own backyard are a favorite of mine as well...

  8. The cheapening of apprenticeship under the fallacy of "education substitution for experience" is lamented universally by craftsmen.

    But praised by educators and youth who see it as easier and quicker to 'get respect' than actually experiencing life. Just CLEP out of it and start as a boss instead...

     

    :icon55:

  9. " We know the stock intake on EFI engines are a huge bottleneck, and that's mostly because they have almost no real taper to them, and are severely undersized."

     

    Do we KNOW this? Or is it a matter of theoretical degrees? How much ideal engineering results in a practical cost-effective increase of meaningful proportion?

    John C says of competition engines "ten 1% things make 10%" which is true. On a competition engine where admittedly, you are working in a different realm than a street engine. 

     

    Everyone is obsessed with peak power, and top rpm numbers. I believe the thing to do here is separate that train of thought from what is going on here. A Street engine will likely be limited to below 7,000 rpms. As such, the limitations between 5,500 rpms and 7,000 can only be so much.

     

    If you work the engine above 7,000 regularly, then a 'bigger port' may be, and likely is advantageous.

     

    But like "Restrictor Plate NASCAR" engines, working around cylinder filling using velocity and flow can result in very tractable, torquey engines with better performance below the stated 7,000 limit. Many of today's engine builders epoxy in the floors of older 'big hole' manifolds to get power when the inlet side is 'restricted' compared to the 'good old days'...and the result is not only do they make the power, they add torque. Cylinder filling is the key.

     

    And that is where this thread was headed the way I read it. And the interjection of higher rpm applications  is just background noise. Like I said, I've been in 7,500 rpm Cedrics...they aren't as fun as they sound. Now an 8,500 rpm A110? An absolute  BLAST to drive. A Caddillac with a 250CID Six blazing away to get the boat moving is not really what you want when you can put a 502 in there and torque it into a reasonable speed in a reasonable manner. We don't own Cosworth BDA's in Capris here... soggy when the secretaries drive it to lunch, but a boulevard killer when the engineers go to a meeting across town. You need what works for the application, and one size does NOT fit all. It takes a basic different approach from the engineering standpoint. That is the basis of this site. Building a screaming L-Series, yeah I can do it. But in a C330? Not on your life! A 3.2 Stroker with small induction for throttle response and torque...or a 3.0 turbocharged mill with maybe an extended camshaft for comparable top end to a built N/A (for the application.)

     

    As to things we "know":

    "We also know that the port is TOO LOW on ALL of the L heads." using absolutes will get you in trouble EVERY time. The L-6 FIA heads had large, raised ports. They were for high-specific output engines, operating at extended rpm ranges (and used EFI in some cases, back in 70-71-72-73!!!) Nissan ENGINEERED the components for intended usage. The stock 165HP L24 we NEVER got was a good example. Originally the L24 was supposed to come with triple carbs and make 165 HP, with the SU's as a 'downmarket version'... The difference between the two?

     

    Not port sizes. It was intake and camshaft. Though I can't confirm it, possibly EXHAUST. The Z432 had a double-exhaust that Trust/Greddy Copied for their aftermarket system. Hung with stock Nissan Hangers and tucking up like an OEM system, bolting it on DID NOT 'kill the bottom end' on any L20 or bigger engine I've done it with. Though many experts quacked about it doing just that, the Bosch Dyno proved otherwise. Short of zoomies out the fender, I think any decorking of the exhaust will net overall benefits...and if the INDUCTION side was optimized for port filling at the bottom end, an unrestricted exhaust will aid in more power there as well! Maybe even with Zoomies, but I wouldn't try it on a street engine.

     

    Cooling of an L-Engine is pretty well done with the modifications known on the cooling thread. Cooling an engine at 4,000 rpms shouldn't be an issue regardless of it's specific output. If the stockish system can handle 1,100 HP at 9,000 rpms, 150 at 4,000 shouldn't be an issue at all. But so many people gloss over the fine details of system matching, and concentrate on bolt-on magic bullets they get a poor result.

  10. I took photos underneath in 95 after it's original restoration was completed. 

    Lots of things were going on on the 25th anniversary of the Z emerging...even if one wasn't available for sale in the USA...

    Hell, Dick Clark was even involved!

  11. "and an AN fittings MUST be made from 7075 or 7071 series aluminum, as of the 1987 update to MS33656-J."

    Stress characteristics of 7075 to the steels used currently...

    You're getting there!

     

    And yes, A/N was the improvement from former SAE the JIC standard didn't exist until much later.

     

    Were Mitsubishi Zeros using JIS/JIC or A/N 37 Spec?

     

    Earls fittings was fouded in SoCal on WWII Aircraft Surplus. Since most competition vehicles exhibit both high vibration AND a demand for efficency in mass packaging, A/N found their way into racing. F1 used A/N Not because it was cheap, they used it because it worked and maintained light weight.

     

    Sherman Tanks used SAE 45's on most hydraulics. Nice, heavy steel and less prone to melt in the inevitable Panzer-Hit inspired flash fire.

     

    SAE/JIC stuff is great for building tanks, but generally with the strength afforded the A/N, it gets the nod. With plenty of aftermarket manufacturers making less expensive hose systems, A/N is not expensive. It may not be TRUE A/N as it doesn't meet MS, but other than some hose connection methods, the joint and threads conform.

  12. As long as the coil you use doesn't vary much in amperage draw from the stock one, and you are conventionally triggering it (one coil, six cylinders) the tachometer error won't be that great.

    If you put in a big honker yellow coil with pleasure ribs and oil vent holes...you might find the tach a 'bit optimistic"---like showing 7,100 at 6,000 and so on... That will require online tweakage of the cal screw on the back as outlined in the JTR Manual for the V8 Conversions.

     

    Mine is off below 1,100 rpms, but spot on above that point.

     

    Aftermarket tachs with a wire from the (-) coil terminal should be universal like the 260 and later tachs.

     

    If it's an earlier (<74) tach that senses current, just keep the current comparable with stock and no worries.

×
×
  • Create New...