-
Posts
2941 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
23
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Posts posted by RTz
-
-
I think you are correct. a custom x member that moves the LCA inner mounts forward and inch, while leaving the steering rack in its factory position front to back would help a lot. It would also increase the wheelbase a little so you'd have to watch out for tire interference.
Moving the inboard pick-up, on its own, has no effect on Ackerman. As stated earlier, moving the outboard pick-up (forward) does, providing the steering knuckle follows it (or moves even farther forward).
What you're looking for is a change in angle between the steering knuckle pivot points and the tie rod pivot points. If you make a change that does not effect that angular relationship, it's not doing anything for Ackerman. Change that angle and you change Ackerman.
-
Bummer!
-
How BMW gets 'some' Ackerman in a front steer package (E30 M3)...
I can't say what percentage the E30 has. What I can say is, a while back I CAD'd up a rearward movement of an S30 rack (around 1.25"), and a surprisingly notable improvement was made. Not anything close to 100%, but enough to warrant consideration, in my opinion.
-
Am I missing something?
You speak the truth. Lengthening the the TC rods increases Ackerman.
-
-
-
I have heard similar things. A good friend of ours has an E-30 M3, mostly essentially stock, but at 2.5L, that he recently boosted and is insanely quick. RTz I’m sure will chime in with more…
Yup, Anders has done a beautiful job boosting a nearly stock S14. Internally stock save for the 2.5L bump, a little healthier intake cam, and a Cometic head gasket (CR now 8.5:1). He's nearly maxing out four 750cc injectors... you do the math.
Anders is a Mid-Ohio record setter... suspension/brakes have been addressed as well. I've driven the car a few times and it's one of the most entertaining car's I've ever driven. He still heckles me for selling my M3.
-
A test fit...
The pictures really don't do it justice. It seems much nicer in person. I'm liking it, so far.
Finishing the ends may be one of the more challenging aspects. Got a couple different ideas I'm kicking around.
-
I'm behind on the SR updates. You'll just have to forgive
An interim update for now...
Probably my least favorite thing about a 510 is the instrument panel. Can't really explain it. I just don't like it (see post #1). Since completing the SR swap, I've been running around dashless, with nothing more than water temp and fuel gauge dangling from the underlying dash frame. It's gotten OLD. Very old.
Different ideas have been rattling around in my head for a while, and long story short, I finally settled on a fairly simple design. It includes seven VDO Vision gauges, and an Innovate G5 AFR gauge. Plasma cut and formed from 1/8" Aluminum...
Much left to do... contouring/welding up the end panels, mounting, wiring, misc. switches & indicator lights, vents, finish work, etc.
Gauges-
- Speedometer
- Tachometer
- Boost
- AFR
- Water Temp.
- EGT
- Air Temp. (serving double duty as both ambient and post intercooler)
- Fuel
- Speedometer
-
Malthus strikes again!
-
Wait...... What?
Happy?
-
I have yet to achieve a questionable title on this board.
Can't say that anymore
-
Bus's rock. I've owned two (both 1970) and hope to again someday.
Thanks for sharing!
-
I assume you don't have the book then? Having one will make your life easier
Chevrolet Part#3990332. 1965-1972 Chev. truck.
-
Uh, no. One moderator moved one thread to the shed. Now would be an excellent time to dispense with the false acusations
-
Why not just set your timing, and AFR and run in closed loop mode? Especially because you can do that at WOT.
Because a post-calculated AFR is not the same as a pre-calculated AFR. With current technology there is some delay... the distance from the chamber to the O2 sensor, sensor response time, and the ECU's reaction time become a factor with rapid engine acceleration. On a static dyno, salt flat car, stationary engine, etc, closed-loop WOT can work well because the transition rates are either slow or non-existent. A turbo car making a blast through low gears happens too quickly for closed-loop to work properly.
I wonder how quick tune will work on the street - without access to a dyno?
Expect accelerated brake wear
-
The Quicktune feature looks interesting....
"At any time after tuning is finished the values in the target closed loop table can be changed, and the engine will automatically run the new air fuel ratio"
-
It runs horrible. 2 cylinders at best. Pretty sure its going to need a full rebuild.... and the tranny... don't even start.
-
I'm not liking you very much right now. I miss my M...
-
Fun car! Congrats Dood.
-
Start with a large fortune.
-
I don't have a racing problem. Really.
-
Whats wrong with you.
How much time have you got?
-
Thanks Joel. It's nice to these posts.
Is ms sequential
in MegaSquirt
Posted
No such thing as "the best".
And, while sequential has merits, it certainly isn't the be-all-end all feature of features. Be careful with putting so many eggs in one basket.