Jump to content
HybridZ

RTz

Administrators
  • Posts

    2941
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Posts posted by RTz

  1. Sorry had to show off a bit:icon29:

     

    You sure did. That thing looks like a hoot!

     

    I bought my wife a Subaru sedan a couple years ago.... never had much prior interest Sube's. Its been a great vehicle and has inspired me to learn more. Your wagon is too cool.

     

    Sorry for the tangent,

  2. ... some .050 guage aluminum to make my pressure box..

     

    .050" won't cut it. I wouldn't boost a plenum with anything less than .125" unless your plenum shape and size is conducive to it.

     

     

    Ron.. what diameter would you recommend for my setup?!

     

    Tapering nicely from 38mm down to 1.375" (at the head) should work well... a fair compromise between response and total power.

  3. I would suspect that one wire is the sensing, one is ground and one is ignition hot. But how do I know which ones, and what is a 4 wire for?

     

    If you're looking for generic NB info... frequently 3-wire sensors will have two white wires and one black. The Black wire is the sensor output, and the two white wires are the heater. The heater has no polarity.

     

    Four wire sensors have an additional ground... sometimes its gray.

     

    HTH,

  4. Ron I'm just curious as to how you are calculating those diameters/torque peak relations. I would like to know what changes these numbers, and how does it apply to ITB setups vs. plenum setups.

     

    Oliver,

     

    The formula comes from a successful engine builder/tuner. I've also taken the time to plug in a few known manifolds and its always been within 2% of actual. So far, the formula confirms that the single largest influence on where the peak falls, is the area of the runner itself. The remaining parameters (TB, plenum size, configuration, etc) will influence the peak to a lesser degree, but can have a substantial impact on either side of the peak (as well as distribution and response)... the formula can't account for 'under the curve'.

     

    Unfortunately, I don't feel at liberty to disclose the math. However I'd be more than happy to run a few scenarios for you.

     

    Provide the following...

     

    Displacement (CID)

    Number of Cylinder's

    Intake Dia.

  5. ....what's next a Mercedes C30?

     

    Looking forward to seeing a Mercedes in his driveway so I can return the crap he flung at me for my Infiniti Q-45.

     

     

    You guy's kill me. I don't know whether to laugh or cry :lmao::cry2:

     

    Shamefully, I've already got one picked out... CLK63 AMG Black Series. 500hp, 0-60 in 4.1, and reportedly brilliant handling...

     

    "The out-of-the-box, on-the-road solution is insane. Anyone who wants, needs or thinks he could use more lateral grip on a public road should have their license revoked on general principle." Jay Shoemaker.

     

    I might be able to DD it :wink:...

     

    CLK63BlackSeries.jpg

    Photo by: No idea.

  6. The S30 Is fun, sexy, raw, competitive, easy to maintain, and you can touch the rear tires without leaving the drivers seat :wink:

     

    As a DD, it also has...

     

    Frightening accident protection.

    Wreaks of fumes (catalyzed, tuned, or otherwise).

    Ride quality disproportionate to handling (and downright unimpressive on irregular pavement).

    Noisy.

    Steering sucks.

    Horrific seats.

    No cruise control.

    Poor lighting.

    Marginal or non-existent HVAC.

     

    By comparison, my E30 M3 has 750 lb/In springs F&R with handling to match the numbers... but surprisingly reasonable compliance and ride quality (ie wife approves). Steering is not only sharp and communicative, its also appropriately weighted and linear as well. Quite enough to have the stereo on at a perceptible level AND carry on a conversation with my delectable wife in a 'normal' tone. Has A/C, Recaro seats, CC, acceptable accident protection, gets 30 MPG, and costs LESS than what it would take to duplicate in an S30. The M3 is one example. There are a number of modern cars that can match or exceed the S30 for less investment... some of them are even 'disposable'.

     

    An S30 is purely a toy in my opinion. A terrificly beautiful, rewarding toy... but still a toy.

     

    Competitive on nearly any level... but not without investing serious time and capitol.

     

    Many of us view it as the perfect canvas with which to paint our masterpiece, and I couldn't agreee more.... I just don't want to drive it every day.

  7. It tapers down at the actual throttle plate to something like 40-45, and thats being conservative.

     

    Hmm.... well, I could be mistaken. I'll check next time I'm out there. That's an EA82 you're looking at correct?

     

    Times two

     

    Its not that simple. Only one intake valve is open at any given time, so separating the cylinders into two banks and using two TB's, doesn't change much. Adding six, one per cylinder, gains you little.

     

    Also, even if the throttle is 45mm, an L28 intake valve is 44mm. While the valve doesn't open completely, and has a stem, don't dismiss the throttle shaft/screws. Its quite restrictive. My point is, even at 45mm its cutting things a little close, in my opinion. I'd like to see about 15-20% more flow through the throttle than the valve. Thats a reasonable compromise between 'enough' and 'too much'.

     

     

    Overall, my point was that through some simple junkyard picking, ideal throttle bodies would probably start to fall in your lap.

     

    Point taken... and its a good one at that. Some of the best ideas have sprouted from the JY.

  8. making a new xmember wouldnt be that bad i wouldnt think. i know some of you guys are fabers so surely we can find a cnc machine or a 3 axis mill or something.

     

    The crossmember is quite easy if you're remotely inclined. No CNC anything required... just basic fab tools.

     

    With your tube frame, you have a clean sheet. Now is when it would be prudent to define what you want and stick to it, else it becomes like my project and many others... never finished. Its far to easy to get caught up in exotic, when all you really want is reasonable improvement. If you don't define where to stop... you wont.

  9. The thing that I see as a problem with trying to get the wheels further underneath the car is that the frame rail is going to limit the turning radius.

     

    I was able to get a tad more than 30 degrees steering angle (with 255/50/16 tires). Unfortunately, I hadn't built in any real ackerman. If I were doing it now, I would design for ackerman and that would reduce that angle (on the outboard wheel).

     

    I agree with the benefits of a wider track. At the time I was very opposed to flares of any sort. Today... I'd probably consider it.

×
×
  • Create New...