Hm... well folks I've got mixed feelings on this one.
First, I'm a firm believer of "to each his own" or "whatever turns your crank" philosophy when it comes to "vehicles and stuff".
But is that what we are talking about here?
Example: I was in H.S. in the late Seventies and my first car, thanks to my step-dad, was a 67 Pontiac GTO. Yes a "classic muscle car" and yes the first thing I did was to mount 15X10 Five Spoke Craigers with N50 MT's on the rear!
But remember, I had a 67 GTO equipped with a 400ci Ram Air, TH 400 and a 12 Bolt with 3.55's! I can still smell the smoke from the tires! Note: I never revved imaginary opponents.
NOT, I repeat NOT a "Econo-Box wantaba with ground effects, custom wheels and a 4 inch fart pipe"! (Owner claims it does 10's in the quarter) :malebitchslap:
What I'm attempting to say is that what my generation did was for Real Performance, not the appearance of performance.
I thought that was what HybridZ was all about? Performance first, like my generation, real performance!
Today's youth have it "ass-backwards" and that's because they don't have performance cars to begin with! A Honda CRX is a performance car?
Yes, IF you apply enough money it could be fast, but hell, if funds permitted I could build the worlds fastest "Briggs and Stratten" lawn mower and beat them! But after its all said and done what do you have? Come on say it, that's right a lawn mower. Same difference folks!
By the way, the performance crowd in Japan don't run Honda's and such. No, they run Skylines and Supra's. Real performance cars... Think about it.
Well I've said my bit, flame me if you want, but I had to vent...
Mark