Jump to content
HybridZ

Garrett76Zt

Members
  • Posts

    677
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Garrett76Zt

  1. Garrett76Zt

    IMG_1927

    From the album: Engine

  2. Garrett76Zt

    IMG_1926

    From the album: Engine

  3. Garrett76Zt

    IMG_1925

    From the album: Engine

  4. Garrett76Zt

    IMG_1919

    From the album: Engine

  5. Garrett76Zt

    IMG_1918

    From the album: Engine

  6. Garrett76Zt

    IMG_1916

    From the album: Engine

  7. Garrett76Zt

    IMG_1917

    From the album: Engine

  8. Sure . . . I'm fine with you thinking that . . . hahaha
  9. I'm sure its not what you're looking for but i had my 3.0 liter(not stroker) on the dyno at only 7 psi with the 60-1 and it made 280whp. . .hehehe
  10. i have no idea about pixels and all that. So im not sure if mines too big.
  11. I've also thought it through, there is actually plenty of aftermarket support for these motors. They have a pretty significant stroker kit for them. On the other hand they are pretty low-tech, being a pushrod motor and all. If i was gonna consider a inline 6 truck motor with that big displacement, it would def. be the newer trailblazer motors. 4.0 liters (i think) DOHC. . . and from what I hear a supra 6 speed can be mated to them. there was a recent issue of hot rod mag which had a chevy nomad with one of these bad boys in it. Turbocharged, custom manifolds, 800hp+ easy. Its like a supra motor with an extra liter!!
  12. hey its lookin great Mike! Maybe you car will be fast now.
  13. Garrett76Zt

    myZsig2

    From the album: Parts

  14. I was up close and personal with one recently. That thing has 325 or 335 tires on the back of that thing! So perhaps not a foot but about 30-40mm anyways!
  15. Yeah your timing map looks a bit conservative. I'm running 21 degrees at 15 psi so im still kinda conservative as well.
  16. the tranny issue would be my main concern. perhaps there is a way to use the AWD tranny and not use the front cv's I've heard of people doing that with the RB26 tranny's.
  17. Bastaad. I agree with most of what your saying. An open mind is a must for this forum. Although i think the original spirit of the site was to improve upon what the z has to offer in stock form. I would consider a l28et pretty close to stock see how little work is involved. And Many V8's have more potential than the L, The RB, 2jz, 7m, etc. etc. etc. Those are all motors that obviously have way more potential than the L28et. I'm just not so sure that the SRT motor has proved its in the same class. My point simply. The L can make 400hp no problem with no major internal mods. there are only a handful of SRT's making more than 450hp or so. It would be a cool and unique swap no doubt. I've just whooped on way too many srt's to consider that a motor i have to have in my Z. Supras on the other hand . . .
  18. Bastaad . . . Stage 3 produces anywhere from 310-355 depending on octane. I am currently running a bone stock 150k+ junkyard NA bottom end(N42) with some bad blowby(rings/lands). the 3.0 is on a stand getting rebuilt. I was on 15psi. He said he was 19psi, maybe more. I slaughtered him from a dig, which he will not stop whining about. 5 cars from a 25mph roll. Roll races are for wusses. Let just compare dyno charts and save the gas. I respect the srt4, heck AMS holds the record at 590hp with only an AFC i believe. But if they are ALWAYS gonna complain about their weak platform then screw it. . .
  19. I beat a 2001 Saleen S-281 Today . . . that was pretty fun. Rated a 365hp 400ft lb torque by Saleen. He wasnt too happy.
  20. I put the hurt on a Stage 3 Mopar SRT on sat. Bigger turbo, injectors, fuel rail, bigger FMIC, Exhaust, 19psi, etc. 7-10 cars from a dig, and 4-5 cars from a roll. I'll stick with my l28et! HAHA
×
×
  • Create New...