Jump to content
HybridZ

bradyzq

Donating Members
  • Content Count

    281
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2
  • Feedback

    0%

bradyzq last won the day on October 12 2018

bradyzq had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

13 Good

1 Follower

About bradyzq

  • Rank
    HybridZ Supporter
  • Birthday 11/18/1968

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.dynodoc.ca

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Interests
    Dyno tuning (it's what I do), standalone ECUs, Webers, Datsuns, old Audis, pretty much any cool car

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I like @Leon's theory that points at the PCV valve as the potential source of the oil. The problem seems to start directly downstream from its entry point in the intake. And you mentioned that there's oil in the intake runners. It would take a LOT of intake reversion to push oil out to the intake if hte source was the valve seals. An easy test is to block the pcv hole in the intake, and run a hose from the pcv up under a windshield wiper. Not that there should be much blowby, but you'll see whatever there is instantly that way.
  2. With a degree wheel, per the cam card specs?
  3. Nope, no ad clicked. I can navigate only for a couple of seconds. Then the subscription window pops up and I can't close it. Running Windows 10 using Chrome.
  4. @BHJ Automotive, access to your site requires a subscription! That's really annoying.
  5. Randalla, Your peak torque and peak hp rpm are very low for you cam. Lower than stock! Is your cam timing where it should be?
  6. When removing added components like amps, phones, alarms, remote starters, etc, etc, it's better to remove the wiring at its source, not just remove the component. That way you discover the sometimes "creative" ways the PO installed it right away, and you can return the wiring to stock. It sometimes takes a bit of wire tracing time, but it's worth it.
  7. Also, if there's room, swap the injectors and crank sensor wires.
  8. Couple of things to consider regarding injector clocking: Do your injectors spray at an angle, or straight? It at an angle, you'll have to aim them so they don't spray onto a port wall. And the connectors will point where they point. No choice. Will you be able to plug and unplug the injector connectors with them facing down? It's not a good idea to be turning them around and stressing the O-rings whenever you need to unplug an injector.
  9. If you're going to split the wiring into 2 looms, I suggest keeping the low current sensors away from the potentially noisy high current actuators.
  10. You can just fill the timing table with 20 for off boost shakedown purposes. Did you turn the engine to TDC1(piston position, not just crank pulley mark) and physically count the teeth between the missing teeth and the crank sensor? That will get you very close.. Mark the crank pulley or side of a trigger wheel tooth if the timing mark on the pulley doesn't line up with the pointer. If the car starts with that setting, set the timing to fixed at 0 degrees. Now make your fine adjustments.
  11. You can always throw the old turbo back on and run it at 23psi and see what it does. You know, in case you want to spend more time and money on this in the name of science...
  12. Not worth it? You're hard to please!! Notwithstanding the mystery issues on the GTX .63 hotside, you now have virtually the same boost threshold as your old turbo with a huge, almost 40 lb*ft gain, all while running 4 psi less boost! To compare apples to apples as much as you can, you really should run 27psi on your new setup and see what happens. I bet the difference will be huge. BTW, journal vs. ball bearing differences are not that huge in terms of absolute power. Transient response should be better though, especially coupled with the more modern wheel design.
  13. Wheel size and offset, tire size, ride height all look PERFECT!!!
  14. Yup. Your main fueling is calculated from the AFM voltage and RPM. No VE. Though there may be an as yet undiscovered WOT fuel map that is unrelated to or a further multiplier of AFM fueling. @Gollum, sorry. I thought the MS logs stupid_fast was referring to were yours. Also, if one is trying to figure out how this stock file works on a modified engine, you may get some weird things going on, such as going off the end of tables. You can see that a stock boost 280ZX likely would have followed a slightly leaner AFR trace, and maybe not hit the last TP column.
×
×
  • Create New...