Graphitez Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 Wow! Subscribed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan_Austin Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 The last couple of times a twin cam 24V L6 head topic has been brought up I thought to myself 'That Derek fellow might just be the guy on this forum to do this in a reproducible fashion' If this comes in less expensive than a California divorce I'll be all over this... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98blackbell Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 Great work, can't wait to see it running Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
310z Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 Great job. Keep the up dates coming. I always thought that an L6 with a four valve head would be an amazing set up to have. Maybe I will have one some day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony D Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 (edited) I would have donated an RB head to you, had I known. I recycled it instead. Why didnt you make the intake and exhaust mirrored like Tony suggested? I suggested the K20 Head since it replicates the S20 layout, so it will look proper. nobody is really going to need swappable left/right intake exhaust options, and the symmetrical ports are not flow proven. As nice a head as the Paeco-Goertz head was for it's time, the ports may not be optimal. Remember it never ran, and used who knows what for port design. The K20 is a 500CC per cylinder flowmonster compared to the L-Head, and the design is proven, and proven quite well I might add. Look at the numbers for even a stock Honda K20, and then look at the aftermarket support you have available. The idea here was to use something that has tremendous existing aftermarket support, or could be scrounged from a junkyard to complete a bare head and then upgraded later. Really the cams, rocker shafts, and drive were the big imponderables. One of the reasons for suggesting the K20 as Derek said was that we could flycut the head top and bottom on a mill, and simply bolt on the cam towers as is in the Honda. That means I could machine bare castings in the shed at my house (if I ever returned...) The rockers are available aftermarket to remove the odd lobe for the VTEC, and just run the aggressive profile which can be cut on a billet easily enough---remember they are ROLLER rockers, so a lot of that sliding friction goes away as does metallurgical issues. This head would really bring the L-Series into the modern day in terms of oil compatibility as well. All I can say is "I kept my mouth shut, wasn't me who leaked anything..." But if you search my posts, you will in retrospect see I was literally bursting keeping this under wraps! As for scrapped heads, Derek can attest that I offered up sacrificial L-Heads so we could do a pour and say "This is an L-Head, just recast a bit different" a melding of old and new. I'm happy to see it take shape and now have to turn on my iPad to get a look at the photos that must be residing there now! Edited September 20, 2014 by Tony D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leon Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 The last couple of times a twin cam 24V L6 head topic has been brought up I thought to myself 'That Derek fellow might just be the guy on this forum to do this in a reproducible fashion' If this comes in less expensive than a California divorce I'll be all over this... I vote this for comment of the year! Again, this is some fantastic engineering, great job Derek. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony D Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 The last couple of times a twin cam 24V L6 head topic has been brought up I thought to myself 'That Derek fellow might just be the guy on this forum to do this in a reproducible fashion' If this comes in less expensive than a California divorce I'll be all over this... For the cost of mine, you could buy a damn fleet of used Ferraris. Hell, for the cost of mine, I could buy an OS Giken Engine complete, and the First Class Tickets to go talk to them in Japan several times while it's being built! I pretty confident it will be less than that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HS30-H Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 Cheap as compared to the OS Giken:) I think that comes in around $40,000.00. Be careful comparing the TC24 (especially the latest version) to anything. What you actually get for your money is a key point, and often misunderstood. Whilst I applaud your efforts, and I'm interested to see the results, I still feel a little non-plussed about it all. Like the 'Goerz-Paeco' (which never actually flew) and the OSG TC24-B1, your custom DOHC head is not going to be legal for any of the historic-based race classes and would likely be bumped up into a class where it will be outgunned. A slightly updated version of Nissan's FIA-homologated 'LY' crossflow or - far more practical - Nissan's FIA-homologated E4621 'Safari' head would be of interest all over the world (so perhaps a better business proposition?) and would be race legal in classes where they would count and would be competitive. Race legality / usefulness may not be an angle that you are concerned with, but if I had the resources it would be one of the first things I would think of from a commercial as well as practical point of view. I noticed the tip o' the hat to the S20 with the valve cover, so you must have at least some empathy with the historic side of all this - yes? Casting '3000' into it might not be such a good idea though. How about giving this thing a name instead? Ultimately it would be more real than using the 'NISSAN' branding, in my opinion. Lastly, I (fondly?!) remember HybridZ threads of the dim and distant past that scoffed at the usefulness of a 24valve DOHC crossflow layout in comparison to the stock L-gata's 12valve non-crossflow layout. Looks like the zeitgeist is a little different these days...? Good luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 The last couple of times a twin cam 24V L6 head topic has been brought up I thought to myself 'That Derek fellow might just be the guy on this forum to do this in a reproducible fashion' If this comes in less expensive than a California divorce I'll be all over this... Love it. I think I want my member name changed from "That Horny Z Guy" to "That Derek Fellow" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 (edited) Hi Be careful comparing the TC24 (especially the latest version) to anything. What you actually get for your money is a key point, and often misunderstood. I wasn't. I was merely using it as an example of the high end of things. Whilst I applaud your efforts, and I'm interested to see the results, I still feel a little non-plussed about it all. Like the 'Goerz-Paeco' (which never actually flew) and the OSG TC24-B1, your custom DOHC head is not going to be legal for any of the historic-based race classes and would likely be bumped up into a class where it will be outgunned. A slightly updated version of Nissan's FIA-homologated 'LY' crossflow or - far more practical - Nissan's FIA-homologated E4621 'Safari' head would be of interest all over the world (so perhaps a better business proposition?) and would be race legal in classes where they would count and would be competitive. Race legality / usefulness may not be an angle that you are concerned with, but if I had the resources it would be one of the first things I would think of from a commercial as well as practical point of view. Not the market I'm going after. This project is as much about proof of concept as anything else. Patternless casting has arrived. It seems expensive, but for this type of project it's ideal. I'm not the only one doing this. Ford racing bought a few of the 3D sand printers and are using them in their head development. There is a guy reproducing Ferrari heads that are NLA, and I'm sure there are more. I do a lot of motorsports work. This head will open up some of my clients eyes even further as to the possibilities. I'm doing this head for the Z because it interests me. And I have a car to put it in! I noticed the tip o' the hat to the S20 with the valve cover, so you must have at least some empathy with the historic side of all this - yes? Casting '3000' into it might not be such a good idea though. How about giving this thing a name instead? Ultimately it would be more real than using the 'NISSAN' branding, in my opinion. I mentioned in the post that the nissan and 3000 were going to be machined in. The actual castings will be blank. Edited September 20, 2014 by Derek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 (edited) The idea here was to use something that has tremendous existing aftermarket support, or could be scrounged from a junkyard to complete a bare head and then upgraded later. Really the cams, rocker shafts, and drive were the big imponderables. One of the reasons for suggesting the K20 as Derek said was that we could flycut the head top and bottom on a mill, and simply bolt on the cam towers as is in the Honda. That means I could machine bare castings in the shed at my house (if I ever returned...) The rockers are available aftermarket to remove the odd lobe for the VTEC, and just run the aggressive profile which can be cut on a billet easily enough---remember they are ROLLER rockers, so a lot of that sliding friction goes away as does metallurgical issues. This head would really bring the L-Series into the modern day in terms of oil compatibility as well. You can also just use all exhaust rockers as they aren't Vtech. As far as machining goes there is one point that may be vexing for people (me) who have never machined a raw head casting. Getting the tops of the valves to line up with the rockers. I modeled in a cam tower and two rocker arms. The models are based on high res scans so they are accurate. I based the location of the tops of the valves from one of the heads I purchased. As you can see in this screen grab there isn't a lot of room for error as far as the angle of attack of the rocker to the valve top. This has been my biggest worry. I imagine you only get one chance to get the angles right on drilling the valve guide bores. I'm not totally sure if the head casting is any good or not. Castings shrink as they cool and you factor that into the design. The problem is at the level I work at it's guesswork. The more cores a casting has the harder it is to predict the shrink rate because the hard sand reduces the shrink. So the reality is the casting may be too long or too short. It may also fail when I have it X-rayed. If the casting is junk then I have 12 tries to determine the right angle. If the casting is good then I'll probably machine a plastic test head that matches the actual casting and practice on that. If anyone has any experience on this kind of valve work I'd love to hear from you:) Edited July 7, 2017 by Derek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clarkspeed Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 Good luck with the machine work ahead of you. Hope the casting is sound. We've been working now with 3D printing the tooling in metal (smaller stuff) for investment casting cores. Technology is moving fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony D Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 "Lastly, I (fondly?!) remember HybridZ threads of the dim and distant past that scoffed at the usefulness of a 24valve DOHC crossflow layout in comparison to the stock L-gata's 12valve non-crossflow layout. Looks like the zeitgeist is a little different these days...?" Remember a key point of those discussions was the ultimate power compared to a $2,400 non-crossflow ported head. $100,000? Forget it. Horsepower per dollar isn't anywhere close to comparable. Nick a zero off that price and suddenly 330+CFM of port flow aat under 0.500" lift (which you will simply never get from a non-crossflow head) becomes relatively affordable. There may be a class where it is race legal. That's being worked out as silently as the initial development was! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 Good luck with the machine work ahead of you. Hope the casting is sound. We've been working now with 3D printing the tooling in metal (smaller stuff) for investment casting cores. Technology is moving fast. Yea if I was doing this for a customer I would tell them to budget for four heads. One for the foundry to get right. One for the machinist and one for the unknown. If your lucky you might hit on #3. There is a lot of good and bad in the 3D printing field. I just wish they hadn't settled on mesh as the modeling standard. I can be quite cavalier when I'm modeling for CAM. who cares about gaps as long as the smallest ball mill won't drop into it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wookieballa Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 I am willing to offer my 1972 skyline up for prototyping this LOL(it has a meager L20 L6 in it, but hey, close enough..)Definitely interested in this conversation. Hopefully this hits an affordable price range when the kinks are all ironed out IF you take it public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaritimeRiceburn Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 What features have you stripped out of the K20 in terms of Honda specialties? Have oil passages for things such as VTEC solenoid been completely removed? or are you simply blocking those off with a plate on the block? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 What features have you stripped out of the K20 in terms of Honda specialties? Have oil passages for things such as VTEC solenoid been completely removed? or are you simply blocking those off with a plate on the block? Pretty much everything. Think of it as the ultimate Vtec killer. I still have things to work out with the cam towers and oil flow. Technically the cam gears would be in the back of the motor if all things were equal to the K20. Since I'm having custom cams made this won't be an issue. Of course since it's custom anything is possible:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnc Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 At least here in the USA, I don't know if even the LY head is legal with SCCA, VARA, HSR, SVRA, etc. The rule sets are generally restricted to USA specific or FIA Group 3 except, maybe, for some IMSA categories. There are a lot of so called "outlaw" series here like Redline Time Attack, etc. but I checked for the TC24B engine and it would be classed with essentially unlimited turbo cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaritimeRiceburn Posted September 20, 2014 Share Posted September 20, 2014 (edited) Pretty much everything. Think of it as the ultimate Vtec killer. I still have things to work out with the cam towers and oil flow. Technically the cam gears would be in the back of the motor if all things were equal to the K20. Since I'm having custom cams made this won't be an issue. Of course since it's custom anything is possible:) Alright, just wondering because looking at K-series design, most of the cam relies on VTEC for lubrication etc. of course I assume this wouldn't apply considering you're using two exhaust cams. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtRlQrAc5IY What was your problem with the honda cam gears? Edited September 20, 2014 by MaritimeRiceburn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Posted September 20, 2014 Author Share Posted September 20, 2014 What was your problem with the honda cam gears? The crank gear was too small to fit over the snout. single chain was my preferred route but there was just no way to make it happen. At least not with off the shelf components. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.