I don't know about the article referenced or Marc Sayer's article, but I was part of some testing done by Javier at JG Engine Dynamics back in the late 1990s. The intent was to build the best autocross BSP 2.8 possible given the rules limitations and triple SUs were tried along with dual SUs, triple Mikunis, and aftermarket stand-along EFI.
The order of performance (max HP and Torque) was:
1. Stand alone EFI (ITBs and Electromotive Tec2).
2. Triple Mikunis (45mm).
3. Dual SUs (44mm).
4. Triple SUs (44mm on modified N36 manifolds).
5. Dual SUs (50mm on modified N36 manifolds).
The fastest BSP 240Zs in the country ran either EFI, Triple Mikunis (Webers), or Dual SUs. I don't know of anyone winning a Divisional or a National event with triple SUs. I don't know of a road racing 240Z running triple SUs, mostly because of classing rules in SCCA.
Triple SUs might be a good setup, but the racers are not running 'em - probably because they are about the same price as triple Mikunis/Webers once all the fab and linkage work is done.
EDIT: I called someone else who was at the testing to refresh my memory. The issue with the triple SUs was that cylinders 3 and 4 ran lean compared to the other cylinders (based on EGT and spark plug reads). Later they shined a strobe light down the middle SU at various rpms and noticed the piston fluttering up and down while the outer two SUs had the piston rock solid.