the purist's against the pillagers
This is not a debate that can be won. The purists are a are single minded in their purpose. The car has to be original no matter how many panels and parts they have to replace. I have had two low number production cars that were “almost†worthy from a purists stand point. In order to get these cars to a point that they would be accepted, it would have rendered them not drivable. They would have become trailer queens. I pass. I turned my back on these people long ago mostly for their lack of comradely.
The Z is a car that lends itself wonderfully to customization, handling and power upgrades. This is the modern equivalent of the ’49 Merc or 32/34 Ford. The proof is in the fact that there are companies based on the sale of parts aimed at the those who wish to modify their Zs.
The bottom line is a hybrid Z car can stop double the number of show goers on a cruise night than a purist car. And the little bugger is faster too! So why argue with some one who doesn’t share our point of view?