I think if you took 100 americans, 2 from each state, and asked them what the plan for rebuilding new orleans is, most would say move it. I thinkt hats what the consensus would be, for the greater good it seems to make sense that the city be rebuilt soemwhere close by that isnt under sea level. I understand how people don't want to move because it is "their home" and that is a valid point but i think if you were to ask these same people in 10 years they will probably be quite happy that their home isn't where it used to be. Also it will make one hell of a monument. Hope that wasn't offensive to anyone, and i am sorry for everyone who suffered. But before peoples emotions overide their smart decision making process, maybe people should step back and weigh the gains vs benefits.
Also the everywhere is dangerous thing isn't really a good example, no offense, because it does not take into account the severity/probability of the danger. As in if you live in florida you can count on a yearly tornado pretty much, but if you live in california count on a big earthquake every 20 or so years.