-
Posts
2481 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
24
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by Leon
-
Anyone can get their hands on some software and make pretty FEA pictures. The question to ask would be, what sort of validation work has been done? It doesn't matter whether they ran their stuff through FEA if it doesn't work in reality. CAE tools help the designer iterate quickly which reduces costs and development time but the end customers only care about results. What does it weigh, how stiff is it, how strong is it, and what have you done to prove that?
-
simplicity and reliability, ZX turbo track toy
Leon replied to stupid_fast's topic in S130 Series - 280ZX
I bet when you were lower, your rear camber was closer to what the front was. That can make a big difference in balance especially if the tires are more camber sensitive. A little bit of toe can go a long way as well. Zero toe in the rear could be a big part of the looseness, depends on your rear toe compliance (rubber bushings or PU?). Also try zero toe up front or even a tad toe out to tone down the yaw rate gain a bit. YRG is essentially a measure of a vehicle's response to a given steering input--the more your point the tires out of the turn, the lower your YRG. Meaning point the fronts out and the rears in if you want to take some oversteer out. Softer springs could help but looking at how early the car oversteers during the cornering process is making me think that the main problem lies elsewhere. I could be totally wrong but that's what I'm reading in between the lines. -
simplicity and reliability, ZX turbo track toy
Leon replied to stupid_fast's topic in S130 Series - 280ZX
Nice work. That thing is loose on entry! What are your alignment settings? With how loose it is right off the bat, it makes it seem like your rear tires are shot and/or not enough rear camber and toe-in (not familiar with the S130 platform but I'll assume it's difficult to dial these in independently with the semi-trailing arms). -
Hi everyone, I'm looking for a local sale on these (Bay Area, CA). I'm selling a set of Panasports in as-new condition, purchased new (no one cares but I paid over $1600 all in). They come with barely used, although aged 7 years, set of Bridgestone RE-11A tires in 225/50R16 all around. I last drove on these 1.5 years ago and they still felt great. The wheels and tires have always been stored indoors. I put maybe 3000 miles on the set before I swapped to 15" Watanabes. I'm sure people will ask about fitment. I've never had rubbing in any situation but my rear fender lips and the stock front valence are already trimmed. It will be tough for me to comment whether they'll fit your specific car or not as it depends on your suspension setup. This tire size is common in Z's and typically fits stock bodies but *may* require modifications. Bolt pattern is 4x114.3 (4x4.5) Offset is zero (ET0)
-
I'm having the same issue @SuperDan
-
And this is what makes HybridZ great. Hell yeah Derek.
-
Ben nailed it. Route the stock belt through the pass-through and find a way to make the buckle work (extension or donor buckle with same style receptacle will do). This is exactly how I run my S2000, using a 2g Eclipse rear seat belt buckle which matches the S2000's latch but is mounted via a cloth belt instead of rigid bracket. Not my photo:
-
Welcome and beautiful Z! HybridZ and CZC co-exist quite well, there's a wealth of info on both forums. And while HybridZ was formed by guys swapping V8's into S30's, there's still loads of great info regarding the original platform as well.
-
Progress on my insane VQ35HR 240Z project
Leon replied to markrolston@mac.com's topic in Nissan V6 Forum
I love following all the stages of this project, keep it up! -
FWIW, I have Hawk Blues on a street-driven E36, I'd call the cold friction perfectly acceptable and nowhere near unsafe. Dust and squeal is another story. I've run DTC-30's on my S2000 for 4 years and have liked them. Not much warm-up required at all (they're fine when driven cold on the street) and have good modulation. I would probably get ~10 days out of them if I had to guess. I was in a pinch last year with worn out front pads before a track day and tossed some PFC 08's in there. The PFC's have felt terrific so far, great fade resistance and modulation, but the squeal is pretty gnarly. It's still street driven so noise is not an inconsequential side-effect.
-
That points to some of the repeat issues I have with the majority of custom suspension parts out on the market. They're almost never designed with structure in mind so they end up over-mass and/or less stiff and less strong.
-
If we're talking rear arms, I think these are what's being referenced: https://silverproject.eu/rear-control-arm-adjustable-arms-for-datsun-240z-260z-280z/ In which case, there are some design issues with them. Mainly, they'll cause binding in the strut (see the many threads on this site on custom rear arms). I'm also not stoked on the shear plate design they have between the outer bushings and the tubes, a bit concerned about buckling which would be exacerbated by bending loads from the ARB and stiction in the bushes. Plus, they cut a hole in the primary lateral load path...
-
SOLD! 1973-ish Datsun 240Z with V8 from 1997 Trans Am
Leon replied to kenny_b's topic in Cars for Sale
A photo of the stamped firewall VIN above the brake booster location would help clear everything up.- 15 replies
-
- mallory
- dakota digital
- (and 30 more)
-
My concerns on durability were more from a lack of isolation from low amplitude, high frequency vibrations (i.e. fatigue loads) coming from the engine. As long as the metal that joins everything together is strong enough, you're fine. It'll be buzzy for sure!
-
Hey Nathan, I'm not seeing the pictures but from what you're describing, the size of the bushings you're using for engine mounts sounds really small. I'd expect them to give you very little isolation and more or less act like solid mounts. You may also run into durability issues, depending on how hard and how often you drive the car.
-
1973 240Z project car, rebuilt all except interior (Tempe AZ)
Leon replied to 240ZinAZ's topic in Cars for Sale
Yup, saw it there. It's hard to pin-point a value but I'd guess you're looking a lot closer to the $7k than $15k. Your Offerup ad is no longer live for reference but if you get $10k, I'd say you did well.- 13 replies
-
- 280zx transmission
- 2.8l engine rebuild
- (and 6 more)
-
1973 240Z project car, rebuilt all except interior (Tempe AZ)
Leon replied to 240ZinAZ's topic in Cars for Sale
ClassicZcars.com is a good place to list. You can also try Facebook, e.g. Datsun Parts and Needs, but that can be a bit of a cesspool at times.- 13 replies
-
- 280zx transmission
- 2.8l engine rebuild
- (and 6 more)
-
Awesome project, looking forward to seeing more! Curious how you'll be handling the BMS and motor controls.
-
1973 240Z project car, rebuilt all except interior (Tempe AZ)
Leon replied to 240ZinAZ's topic in Cars for Sale
Forwarding to a few friends that are looking for one.- 13 replies
-
- 280zx transmission
- 2.8l engine rebuild
- (and 6 more)
-
Agreed. Stock suspension with good dampers and at least 3" of bump travel will do the trick.
-
RB25DE, RB26 NA conversion or L28 rebuild 280z restomod
Leon replied to Paul's topic in Nissan RB Forum
No worries, shout if you have any questions and let us know what you decide.- 5 replies
-
- 280z restomod
- 280z
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
You've decimated the main lateral load path which transfers tire forces into the body via the lower control arms. The chassis has lost a lot of lateral stiffness. I agree with Cary regarding putting high bending loads into your rack bar and killing steering feel. At best, your lateral dynamics and steering take a hit. At worst, you'll have premature rack failure and fatigue failure somewhere in the crossmember. A shear plate welded to the bottom will certainly help. The engine also looks very close to the crossmember. Are you solid-mounting the engine? In that case, it may very well become a stressed-member in cornering as well...
-
If the mustache bar bushings are made solid then some of the concerns are alleviated. I don't disagree regarding compliant toe, factory rear suspension probably also goes toe-out in cornering, but that's something I would aim to fix if I were redesigning the suspension. I do disagree about the diff mounting. From a quick google, you can see that the aft bushings are pressed into the Mustang's subframe. The inner metal of the bushing directly connects to the diff and allows the diff to move within the confines of that bushing. That's the proper use of a diff bushing. What I'm seeing on the Apex setup is that the bushings are sandwiched between the diff and the subframe. Unless the bushings are actually metal spacers (don't see a reason why that would be though), this is a huge no-no for that fastened joint. I smell either a fatigue failure coming on for the diff mount bolts or the bolts backing out completely. As was mentioned previously, as it sits, that bushing would only have a chance at isolating longitudinal forces. In short, that's absolutely not the correct application of a diff bushing, if that is the case.
-
Here are some issues I have with this: - the LCA's are mounted to a frame which is hard mounted on one side and soft mounted on the other side (!) - this will cause a toe-out scenario under cornering which can make the car snappy and unpredictable - they coupled diff torque reaction to the LCA pickup - the diff is potentially mounted on isolators at the snout but hard-mounted at the case (hard to tell based on all the photos floating around) - what's the mass save (or add)? - other stuff, see screenshot